Benchmark: Lodash functionality to convert string to Uppercase vs native js

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:


console.log('');

Tests:

lodash
const value = _.camelCase('Foo Bar'); console.log(value);
regular
function camelize(str) { return str.replace(/(?:^\w|[A-Z]|\b\w|\s+)/g, function (match, index) { if (+match === 0) return ""; // or if (/\s+/.test(match)) for white spaces return index == 0 ? match.toLowerCase() : match.toUpperCase(); }); } const value = camelize('Foo Bar'); console.log(value);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash
regular

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 133 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash	356863.3 Ops/sec
regular	389556.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark compares two approaches to achieve the same result: using Lodash (a popular JavaScript utility library) versus implementing it manually.

The test cases are designed to measure the performance difference between these two approaches:

1. **Lodash**: The first test case uses the `_.camelCase` function from Lodash, which converts a string from camelCase to lowercase.
2. **Regular expression approach**: The second test case implements the same logic using a regular expression to achieve the desired result.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares two options:

* **Lodash**: A pre-built JavaScript library that provides various utility functions.
* **Regular expression approach**: A custom implementation of the desired functionality using regular expressions.

**Pros and cons of each approach:**

1. **Lodash**:
	* Pros:
		+ Convenient to use, as it's a well-maintained library with a wide range of features.
		+ Reduces code duplication and saves time for developers who need similar functionality.
	* Cons:
		+ Adds dependency on an external library, which might not be desirable in all cases (e.g., security or performance-critical applications).
		+ May introduce additional overhead due to the size and complexity of the library.
2. **Regular expression approach**:
	* Pros:
		+ Does not add any external dependencies, making it suitable for smaller projects or those with specific requirements.
		+ Allows for fine-grained control over the implementation and performance optimization.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires more code and expertise in regular expressions to implement correctly.
		+ May be less readable and maintainable than the Lodash version.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks, such as:

* String manipulation (e.g., `_.camelCase`, `_.kebabCase`)
* Array manipulation (e.g., `_.map`, `_.filter`)
* Object manipulation (e.g., `_.merge`, `_.cloneDeep`)

Lodash is widely used in the JavaScript community and is considered a best practice for many projects.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. The regular expression approach uses standard JavaScript syntax, while Lodash relies on its own proprietary functions.

Now, let's talk about other alternatives:

* **Using native JavaScript functions**: Depending on the specific use case, it might be possible to achieve the desired result using only built-in JavaScript functions, without relying on external libraries or custom implementations.
* **Other library alternatives**: While Lodash is a popular choice, there are other utility libraries available that provide similar functionality, such as Underscore.js or Ramda.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash functionality to convert string to Uppercase vs native js (version: 0)

lodash vs native uppercase

Comparing performance of: lodash vs regular

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash

regular

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):