Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
addition operator bracket
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
addition operator not bracket vs addition operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
this.number = Math.random() * 1000 + 1;
Tests:
addition operator not bracket
let a = 0; for (let i=1; i<=100000; i++){ a += i + this.number -i }
addition operator
let a = 0; for (let i=1; i<=100000; i++){ a += (i + this.number -i) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
addition operator not bracket
addition operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. It contains four main properties: 1. **Name**: The name of the benchmark, which in this case is "addition operator bracket". 2. **Description**: An optional description of the benchmark, which is null in this case. 3. **Script Preparation Code**: A JavaScript code snippet that prepares the test environment before running the benchmark. In this case, it generates a random number between 1 and 1000 using `Math.random() * 1000 + 1`. 4. **Html Preparation Code**: An optional HTML code snippet that prepares the test environment before running the benchmark. It's null in this case. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases defined: 1. **Test Case 1: "addition operator not bracket"** * The benchmark definition is a JavaScript loop that increments a variable `a` by the sum of three expressions: `i`, `this.number - i`, and `(i + this.number - i)`. Note that there are no brackets (`[]`) around the parentheses. 2. **Test Case 2: "addition operator"** * The benchmark definition is similar to Test Case 1, but with brackets around the parentheses: `a += (i + this.number - i)`. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare two different approaches to evaluating the expression: 1. **Without brackets**: The first test case (`addition operator not bracket`) uses a single set of parentheses to evaluate the expression inside the loop. 2. **With brackets**: The second test case (`addition operator`) uses square brackets `[]` around the parentheses to create an array literal. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Without brackets (Test Case 1)** * Pros: + Faster execution, since the expression is evaluated only once. + Less memory usage, as there's no temporary array created. * Cons: + May lead to optimization issues or incorrect results if the expression has side effects. 2. **With brackets (Test Case 2)** * Pros: + More predictable and safe, since the expression is evaluated in a separate scope. + Easier to debug, as errors are reported separately from the loop iteration. * Cons: + Slower execution, due to the creation of a temporary array. + More memory usage, as a new array is created on each iteration. **Library and Special JS Features** There's no library used in these benchmark definitions. However, if there were any libraries involved, it would likely be something like: * `Array.prototype.map()`: If the expression was being evaluated inside an array map function. * `eval()`: If the expression was being passed to `eval()` for evaluation. **Special JS Features** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. However, if there were any special features like: * `let` and `const` declarations * `Arrow functions` * `Async/await` syntax they wouldn't be relevant to the comparison of the two test cases. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for measuring JavaScript performance could include: * **Benchmarks using a Web Workers**: Using Web Workers to run the benchmark in parallel, which can help with concurrency and multithreading. * **Profiling tools like Chrome DevTools or Node.js Inspector**: Using profiling tools to measure the execution time of specific functions or methods, rather than running benchmarks. * **Benchmarking frameworks like Benchmark.js**: Using a dedicated benchmarking framework that provides more advanced features and controls for writing microbenchmarks.
Related benchmarks:
Javascript number with and without exponent (e)
Large number product of x consecutive digits
Division
Division2
parse float
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?