Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
getEventGroups
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
getEventGroups vs getEventGroupsMemoize vs getEventGroupsMemoizeSerialize
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var options = [{ label: 'kustomer.conversation.create', value: 'kustomer.conversation.create', }, { label: 'kustomer.conversation.update', value: 'kustomer.conversation.update', }, { label: 'kustomer.customer.create', value: 'kustomer.customer.create', }, { label: 'kustomer.customer.update', value: 'kustomer.customer.update', }, { label: 'kustomer.message.create', value: 'kustomer.message.create', }, { label: 'kustomer.message.update', value: 'kustomer.message.update', }, { label: 'kustomer.team.create', value: 'kustomer.team.create', }, { label: 'kustomer.team.update', value: 'kustomer.team.update', }, { label: 'kustomer.user.create', value: 'kustomer.user.create', }, { label: 'kustomer.user.update', value: 'kustomer.user.update', }, ]; var getEventGroups = (eventsList) => { const groups = {}; eventsList.forEach((event) => { const group = event.value.split('.', 2)[1]; if (!groups[group]) groups[group] = { label: group, options: [] }; groups[group].options.push(event); }); return Object.values(groups); } var getEventGroupsMemoize = _.memoize(getEventGroups); var getEventGroupsMemoizeSerialize = _.memoize(getEventGroups, (...args) => JSON.stringify(args));
Tests:
getEventGroups
getEventGroups(options)
getEventGroupsMemoize
getEventGroupsMemoize(options)
getEventGroupsMemoizeSerialize
getEventGroupsMemoizeSerialize(options)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getEventGroups
getEventGroupsMemoize
getEventGroupsMemoizeSerialize
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JavaScript function called `getEventGroups` that takes an array of events as input and returns an object with grouped event options. The function uses a simple approach to group events by their value's second part (e.g., `kustomer.conversation.create` becomes `conversation.create`). **Options Comparison** The benchmark compares three different approaches: 1. **Original implementation**: This is the original `getEventGroups` function without any optimization or modification. 2. **Memoized version**: This is a memoized version of the original function using Lodash's `memoize` method, which caches the results of expensive function calls and reuses them when the same inputs occur again. 3. **Memoized with serialization**: This is another memoized version of the original function that uses `JSON.stringify` to serialize the input arguments before caching the result. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Original implementation**: * Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and doesn't introduce any additional dependencies. * Cons: May be slow due to repeated computations for the same inputs. 2. **Memoized version**: * Pros: Caches results for expensive function calls, reducing computation time for subsequent executions with the same input. * Cons: Requires Lodash library, which may not be present in all environments. 3. **Memoized with serialization**: * Pros: Combines caching with stringification, which can help reduce memory usage by serializing complex inputs. * Cons: May lead to slower performance due to the additional overhead of serializing and deserializing data. **Library and its Purpose** The Lodash library is used for memoization. Memoization is a technique where the results of expensive function calls are cached and reused when the same inputs occur again, reducing computation time by avoiding redundant calculations. In this benchmark, Lodash's `memoize` method is used to create memoized versions of the original function, which helps reduce computation time by caching results for repeated executions with the same input. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code primarily relies on standard JavaScript and Lodash functions. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options: 1. **Caching with V8's built-in caching**: Some JavaScript engines, like V8 (used by Chrome), have built-in caching mechanisms that can be leveraged for memoization. 2. **Using `Map` or `WeakMap` for caching**: Instead of using Lodash's `memoize`, you could use JavaScript's built-in `Map` or `WeakMap` data structures to implement caching. 3. **Using a library like `memorization`**: There are other libraries available, such as `memorization`, that provide memoization functionality for JavaScript functions. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as efficient or convenient as using Lodash's `memoize` method, but they can serve as interesting alternatives to explore.
Related benchmarks:
test benchmark 03e3434
CircleSmallTest
Lodash.get vs &&
Lodash vs. Set Intersection vs Array intersection 3
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?