Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date vs moment 1238uu
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
moment vs dDate
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
Tests:
moment
const now = moment();
dDate
const now = new Date().getTime()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
moment
dDate
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two JavaScript libraries: Moment.js and a custom implementation using the Date object. The test case measures the execution time of creating a new Date object or using the moment() function from Moment.js. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates. 2. **Custom Date implementation**: Using the built-in Date object in JavaScript. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Moment.js:** Pros: * High-level abstraction, making it easier to work with dates * Supports various date formats and timezone calculations * Active community support and large user base Cons: * Additional dependency ( Moment.js library) * Potential performance overhead due to the abstraction layer * Not suitable for all use cases where raw Date object manipulation is required **Custom Date implementation:** Pros: * No additional dependency or overhead * Raw Date object manipulation allows for fine-grained control and optimization * Suitable for most use cases where only basic date operations are required Cons: * Requires manual handling of dates, which can lead to errors if not done correctly * May require more boilerplate code compared to using Moment.js **Other Considerations** The benchmark uses the `executionsPerSecond` metric to measure performance. This metric represents the average number of times each option is executed per second. In this specific benchmark, the custom Date implementation outperforms Moment.js, indicating that creating a new Date object using the built-in JavaScript functions is faster. **Library Used** Moment.js is used as a library in this benchmark. It's a popular and widely-used library for working with dates, providing a high-level abstraction and various features like date formatting, timezone calculations, and more. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided information. The focus of the benchmark is on comparing the performance of two different approaches to creating Date objects. Overall, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of using Moment.js versus a custom implementation using the built-in Date object in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
moment vs datefns format f
moment vs datefns format f2
MomentJS vs Native Date
date-fns vs moment
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?