Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Foreach lodash vs native
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs native
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="lodash.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = [...Array(100000).keys()];
Tests:
lodash
_.forEach(array, x => { const a = x * 1.5; })
native
array.forEach(x => { const a = x * 1.5; })
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring performance differences between various approaches can be fascinating and insightful. Let's break down what's happening in this benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: 1. Using the `lodash` library for iterating over an array using `_.forEach()`. 2. Iterating over the same array using native JavaScript syntax (`array.forEach()`). **What are we testing?** We're testing how fast each approach can iterate over a large array and perform a simple calculation on each element. **Options being compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Lodash library**: `_lodash` is a popular JavaScript library that provides a collection of reusable functions for various tasks, including iteration. In this benchmark, we're using the `_.forEach()` function to iterate over the array. 2. **Native JavaScript syntax**: The native JavaScript syntax uses the `array.forEach()` method to iterate over the array. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash library**: + Pros: Provides a reusable, tested, and well-maintained function for iteration. + Cons: Adds an extra dependency (the `_lodash` library) that may not be included in every JavaScript environment. * **Native JavaScript syntax**: + Pros: No additional dependencies are required, as it's part of the native JavaScript language. + Cons: May require more boilerplate code and manual error handling. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a collection of reusable functions for various tasks. In this benchmark, we're using the `_.forEach()` function to iterate over the array. `_lodash` also provides other useful functions, such as `_.map()`, `_.filter()`, and more. **Special JS feature or syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in these test cases. Both approaches use standard JavaScript syntax for iteration. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The preparation code provided sets up an array with 100,000 elements using the `[...Array(100000).keys()]` syntax. This creates an array of numbers from 0 to 99,999. **HTML Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes a script tag that loads the `_lodash.js` file, which provides the `_.forEach()` function used in the benchmark. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show two tests: "Lodash" and "Native". The results indicate that the native JavaScript syntax is slightly faster than the Lodash library for this particular use case. In terms of alternatives, other approaches to iterating over arrays include: * Using `Array.prototype.forEach()` directly on the array object. * Using a `for` loop with an index variable. * Using a `while` loop or recursive function. These alternatives may have varying performance characteristics depending on the specific use case and JavaScript environment.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.forEach vs Lodash forEach
Array.prototype.some vs Lodash some
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every
lodash vs for-of vs forEach vs map v2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?