Benchmark: random test benchmark asdasd

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var currentDraft = {
  id: "3fa85f64-5717-4562-b3fc-2c963f66afa6",
  user: {
  	id: "userID",
    firstname: "firstname",
    lastname: "lastname",
    email: "email"
  },
  languages: [{
    id: "language1Id",
    draftId: "3fa85f64-5717-4562-b3fc-2c963f66afa6",
    name: "fi",
    highlight: "new highlight",
    skills: [
        {
            skillType: "INTERACTION",
            skillLevel: 1
        },
        {
            skillType: "VERBAL",
            skillLevel: 2
        },
        {
            skillType: "LISTENING",
            skillLevel: 3
        },
        {
            skillType: "READING",
            skillLevel: 4
        },
        {
            skillType: "WRITING",
            skillLevel: 5
        }
    ]
},
{
    id: "language2Id",
    draftId: "3fa85f64-5717-4562-b3fc-2c963f66afa6",
    name: "se",
    highlight: "new highlight",
    skills: [
        {
            skillType: "INTERACTION",
            skillLevel: 1
        },
        {
            skillType: "VERBAL",
            skillLevel: 2
        },
        {
            skillType: "LISTENING",
            skillLevel: 3
        },
        {
            skillType: "READING",
            skillLevel: 4
        },
        {
            skillType: "WRITING",
            skillLevel: 5
        }
    ]
}],
  generalSections: {
    introduction: "string",
    culturalCompetence: "string",
    languageSkillsDescription: "string"
  }
}

function updateDraft(id, draft) {
	return new Promise(draft);
}

function setCurrentDraft(draft) {
  console.log(draft);
}

Tests:

own
const createNewLanguage = async () => { const updatedDraft = { ...currentDraft, languages: currentDraft.languages.concat(createNewLanguageObject(language, currentDraft.id)) } const updatedDraftWithId = await updateDraft( currentDraft.id, updatedDraft ); setCurrentDraft(updatedDraftWithId); };
other
const createNewLanguage = async () => { const createUpdatedDraft = _.flow( getUpdatedLanguagesArray(currentDraft.languages)(currentDraft.id), getUpdatedDraft(currentDraft) ); const updatedDraftWithId = await updateDraft( currentDraft.id, createUpdatedDraft(language) ); setCurrentDraft(updatedDraftWithId); }; function getUpdatedLanguagesArray(languages) { return function forDraftWithId(draftId) { return function withNewLanguage(language) { const updatedLanguages = languages.slice(); const newLanguage = createNewLanguageObject(language, draftId); updatedLanguages.push(newLanguage); return updatedLanguages; }; }; } function createNewLanguageObject(language, currentDraftId) { return { id: "", draftId: currentDraftId, name: language.title, highlight: "", samples: [], attachments: [], }; } function getUpdatedDraft(currentDraft) { return function withLanguages(updatedLanguages) { const updatedDraft = _.cloneDeep(currentDraft); updatedDraft.languages = updatedLanguages; return updatedDraft; }; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
own
other

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of JavaScript code is crucial in understanding how different libraries, approaches, and features affect execution speed.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests two different approaches for creating and updating language objects in an object. Here's a breakdown of what's being tested:

**Approach 1: Manual Creation**

The first test case uses a manual approach to create a new language object:
```javascript
const updatedDraft = {
  ...currentDraft,
  languages: currentDraft.languages.concat(createNewLanguageObject(language, currentDraft.id))
};
```
This approach involves creating a new object by spreading the existing `currentDraft` object (`{ ...currentDraft }`) and then concatenating it with a new language object created using the `createNewLanguageObject` function.

**Approach 2: Lodash Utility Function**

The second test case uses a Lodash utility function to create a new language object:
```javascript
const updatedDraftWithId = await updateDraft(
  currentDraft.id,
  _.flow(
    getUpdatedLanguagesArray(currentDraft.languages)(currentDraft.id),
    getUpdatedDraft(currentDraft)
  )(language)
);
```
This approach utilizes the `_.flow` function from Lodash to chain multiple functions together. The first function, `getUpdatedLanguagesArray`, takes the existing languages array and returns a new function that updates it with the new language object. The second function, `getUpdatedDraft`, takes the updated languages array and returns an updated draft object.

**Comparison of Approaches**

Both approaches aim to update the `languages` array in the `currentDraft` object. However, they differ in their implementation:

* Manual Approach:
	+ Pros: Simple and straightforward.
	+ Cons: May lead to unnecessary object cloning or duplication.
* Lodash Utility Function:
	+ Pros: Utilizes a well-known library for utility functions, reducing code duplication.
	+ Cons: Requires an additional dependency (Lodash) and may introduce complexity.

**Other Considerations**

When testing JavaScript performance, other factors to consider:

* **Object Cloning**: The approach used affects the number of object clones or duplications. Manual approaches might create unnecessary objects, while utility functions like Lodash's `_.cloneDeep` can help mitigate this.
* **Dependency Management**: Including external libraries like Lodash can affect benchmark results. However, if the library is already included in the project, its performance impact should be considered.
* **Code Readability and Maintainability**: While performance is crucial, code readability and maintainability are also important factors to consider.

**Alternatives**

For creating language objects, alternative approaches could include:

* Using a dedicated library like `lodash-es` or ` Ramda`, which provide functional programming utilities for object manipulation.
* Implementing custom functions using modern JavaScript features, such as arrow functions and destructuring.
* Utilizing a build tool like Webpack or Rollup to optimize code generation and reduce overhead.

In conclusion, when measuring the performance of JavaScript code, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between approach simplicity, library dependencies, object cloning, and maintainability. By understanding these factors, you can create benchmarks that accurately reflect the performance characteristics of your specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

random test benchmark asdasd (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: own vs other

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

own

other

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):