Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) new
(version: 1)
measures the speed of ramda's map vs Array's native map vs lodash map
Comparing performance of:
Ramda vs Array (native) vs Lodash vs Ramda 2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js"></script> <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function double(n) { return n*2; } var data = [...Array(20)].map((v, idx) => idx);
Tests:
Ramda
R.map(double, data);
Array (native)
data.map(double);
Lodash
_.map(data, double);
Ramda 2
R.map(double, data);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ramda
Array (native)
Lodash
Ramda 2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/135.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 135 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Ramda
28166342.0 Ops/sec
Array (native)
20767784.0 Ops/sec
Lodash
52986584.0 Ops/sec
Ramda 2
26314628.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of Map() benchmarks. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test for measuring the performance of different approaches to map over an array: 1. **Array (native)**: The native `map()` function built into JavaScript arrays. 2. **Ramda**: A functional programming library that provides a `map()` function. 3. **Lodash**: Another popular functional programming library that also provides a `map()` function. The test cases are designed to compare the performance of these three approaches on a simple dataset, where each element is a unique index value. **Options compared** Here's what's being compared: * The native `map()` function (Array) * Ramda's `map()` function * Lodash's `map()` function **Pros and Cons** 1. **Native Array map()**: Fastest execution time, but may not be as readable or maintainable for complex transformations. 2. **Ramda map()**: More expressive and flexible, thanks to its functional programming nature. However, it may come with a performance overhead due to the added abstraction. 3. **Lodash map()**: Similar to Ramda, Lodash's `map()` function offers more expressiveness, but also potentially slower execution times. In general, the choice between these options depends on: * Performance-critical applications: Native Array map() * Code readability and maintainability: Ramda or Lodash * Balance between performance and expressiveness: Either Ramda or Lodash **Library descriptions** 1. **Ramda**: A lightweight functional programming library that provides a set of higher-order functions for manipulating arrays, objects, and sets. Its `map()` function takes two arguments: a function to apply to each element, and the array to map over. 2. **Lodash**: Another popular functional programming library that offers a broad range of utility functions for working with data structures like arrays, objects, and more. Its `map()` function is similar to Ramda's. **Special JS features or syntax** None are mentioned in this benchmark. **Alternative approaches** If you need to optimize map() performance further: * Use a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler like V8 (Chrome's engine) to optimize the native Array map() implementation. * Consider using specialized libraries like `fast-map` or `map-ify`, which aim to improve performance while maintaining readability. * If using functional programming libraries, explore optimizations specific to those libraries, such as memoization or caching. Keep in mind that this benchmark is designed for a simple use case. Real-world applications may require more consideration of factors like data size, complexity, and other optimizations.
Related benchmarks:
Map (Native vs Rambda vs Lodash)
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) latest 2021-01-18
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) v2
Map (Native vs Ramda 0.27.2 vs Lodash 4.17.21) 50k
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?