Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
parseFloat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Number vs unary+ vs parseFloat vs Multi
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Number
var number = Number(Math.random().toFixed(2));
unary+
var unary = +Math.random().toFixed(2);
parseFloat
var parse = parseFloat(Math.random().toFixed(2));
Multi
var parse = 1*Math.random().toFixed(2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Number
unary+
parseFloat
Multi
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The `BenchmarkDefinition` section is empty, which means that no specific JavaScript function or syntax is being tested in this benchmark. Instead, it appears to be a collection of individual test cases. **Individual Test Cases** Each test case consists of a single line of code that demonstrates different ways of parsing numbers in JavaScript. Here's a brief explanation of each: 1. `var number = Number(Math.random().toFixed(2));`: This uses the built-in `Number` function to parse a string representing a floating-point number. 2. `var unary = +Math.random().toFixed(2);`: This uses the unary plus operator (`+`) to coerce a string representing a floating-point number into a number. 3. `var parse = parseFloat(Math.random().toFixed(2));`: This uses the `parseFloat` function to parse a string representing a floating-point number. 4. `var parse = 1*Math.random().toFixed(2);`: This multiplies a random integer by a decimal value, resulting in a non-integer number that needs parsing. **Comparison and Pros/Cons** The benchmark compares the performance of each test case across different JavaScript engines (in this case, Chrome). The results are likely used to determine which method is the fastest. Pros: * Using `Number` might be more readable and concise. * Using unary plus (`+`) can be a quick fix for parsing numbers, but it may not be as efficient as other methods. * `parseFloat` provides more control over parsing, but it can also lead to errors if the input string is not in the expected format. Cons: * Using `Number` might be less readable than using `parseFloat`, especially when dealing with edge cases. * Unary plus (`+`) can lead to integer division if used incorrectly. * `parseFloat` might not handle all possible input formats, potentially leading to errors. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no explicit libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines (like SpiderMonkey) provide built-in support for parsing numbers using various methods. No special JS features are used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches to parsing numbers in JavaScript include: * Using `parseInt` instead of `parseFloat`, which can be more efficient but also more error-prone. * Using a library like `parse-numbers` or `number-parser` that provides optimized parsing functions for specific input formats. * Implementing custom parsing logic using regular expressions or other techniques. It's worth noting that the results of this benchmark might not generalize to all use cases, as performance can depend on factors like input data, platform, and optimization settings.
Related benchmarks:
Float string optimization: parseFloat() vs regex
Float string optimization: parseFloat() vs regex, full version
parse number from string
string to number convert
Number vs + vs parseFloat v2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?