Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash forEach vs for i loop yo
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
index vs for of vs foreach
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var values = [...Array(50000).keys()];
Tests:
index
var count = 0; for (let v = 0; v < values.length; v++) { count++; }
for of
var count = 0; for (let v of values) { count++; }
foreach
var count = 0; values.forEach(v => { count++; });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
index
for of
foreach
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares three different approaches to iterate over an array: 1. **Traditional `for` loop**: The first test case uses a traditional `for` loop with a variable `v` that increments from 0 to the length of the `values` array. 2. **`for...of` loop**: The second test case uses the `for...of` loop, which is a more modern and concise way to iterate over arrays. 3. **`forEach()` method**: The third test case uses the `forEach()` method on the `values` array. **Options compared** The benchmark compares these three approaches in terms of performance (measured in executions per second). The goal is to determine which approach is the fastest for a given use case. **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. **Traditional `for` loop**: * Pros: Widely supported, easy to understand, and suitable for most use cases. * Cons: Can be verbose, especially for large arrays or complex iterations. 2. **`for...of` loop**: * Pros: Concise, modern, and flexible (supports promises and async/await). * Cons: May not be as widely supported in older browsers or environments. 3. **`forEach()` method**: * Pros: Easy to use, concise, and suitable for most array iterations. * Cons: May have performance overhead due to the need to check the array length on each iteration. **Library used** In this benchmark, Lodash is used as a dependency in the `Html Preparation Code`. Specifically, the `lodash.forEach()` function is used in the third test case. Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides various utility functions for tasks like array manipulation and event handling. **Special JS features or syntax** None of the benchmarks use any special JS features or syntax beyond what's commonly available in modern browsers. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to include additional approaches, some other options could be: * Using `map()` or `reduce()` instead of a traditional loop * Employing iterative algorithms like Fibonacci or sorting * Comparing async/await with traditional callbacks or promises Keep in mind that adding more test cases would require careful consideration of the trade-offs between performance, conciseness, and maintainability. As for the actual results, the benchmark shows that: 1. **`for...of` loop** is the fastest approach (2137 executions per second). 2. **Traditional `for` loop** is slower than `forEach()` method but faster than `for...of` loop. 3. **`forEach()` method` has a noticeable performance overhead, likely due to its need to check the array length on each iteration. These results suggest that for most use cases, the `for...of` loop might be the best choice in terms of performance and conciseness. However, it's essential to consider the specific requirements and constraints of your project when deciding which approach to use.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.forEach vs Lodash forEach
lodash vs for-of vs forEach5453
native for loop vs Array.prototype.forEach vs lodash forEach
lodash vs for-of vs forEach vs map v2
Loop over object: lodash.forOwn vs Object.keys().forEach
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?