Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
reduce vs flatMap vs map test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
reduce vs flatMap vs map
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = new Array(10000).fill(1);
Tests:
reduce
arr.reduce((res,x) => { res.push(x*x); return res; },[]);
flatMap
arr.flatMap(x => x*x);
map
arr.map(x => x*x);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
reduce
flatMap
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which specifies the type of test to be performed. In this case, it's a three-way comparison between three different array methods: `reduce`, `flatMap`, and `map`. The script preparation code initializes an array of 10,000 elements filled with the value 1. **Options Compared** The three options being compared are: 1. **Map**: This method creates a new array by executing the provided function on each element of the original array. 2. **Reduce**: This method applies a reducing function to each element of the array, accumulating a single output value. 3. **FlatMap**: This method is similar to `map`, but it also flattens an array of arrays into a single array. **Pros and Cons** * **Map**: * Pros: Maps are generally faster than reduces because they don't accumulate values in memory. * Cons: Creates a new array, which can be memory-intensive for large inputs. * **Reduce**: * Pros: Accumulates values in memory, making it suitable for finding the sum of an array or calculating the cumulative product. * Cons: Can be slower than maps because it needs to iterate over each element multiple times. * **FlatMap**: * Pros: Similar to `map`, but also flattens arrays, making it useful when working with nested data structures. * Cons: Can be slower than `map` due to the additional array flattening step. **Library and Purpose** None of the test cases explicitly use a library. The code is self-contained, using only built-in JavaScript functions. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** For comparing the performance of different array methods, other alternatives include: * Using a profiler to measure the execution time of each method. * Implementing a custom loop for `reduce` and `flatMap` to compare their performance with `map`. * Creating a benchmarking library that supports multiple benchmarking algorithms. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may require more effort to set up and run, but they can provide more detailed insights into the performance characteristics of each method.
Related benchmarks:
Tim's reduce vs flatMap
Reduce vs flatMap performance
flat map vs reduce concat
Reduce Push vs. flatMap with subarrays
flatMap vs reduce flattern array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?