Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
last element
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
length vs slice
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var test = [1,2,3]
Tests:
length
test[test.length - 1]
slice
test.slice(-1)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
length
slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON to understand what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is created using a simple array `var test = [1,2,3]`. This represents the "Script Preparation Code" section of the benchmark definition. The purpose of this code is to create a basic array that will be used for testing various operations. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases defined: 1. `"test[test.length - 1]"`: This test case accesses the last element of the `test` array using square bracket notation (`[]`). Specifically, it uses the indexing operator (`[]`) to access the element at the index calculated by `test.length - 1`. 2. `"test.slice(-1)"`: This test case creates a new array by taking the last element of the original `test` array using the `slice()` method with a negative offset (`-1`). The resulting array will contain only the last element. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are compared: * **Accessing the last element using indexing**: Using square bracket notation to access the element at the calculated index. * **Using the `slice()` method**: Creating a new array by taking the last element of the original array. **Pros and Cons** * **Indexing (square bracket notation)**: + Pros: Fast, direct access to elements. + Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable for complex indexing scenarios. * **`slice()` method**: + Pros: More flexible and readable than indexing, especially for extracting multiple elements from an array. Also provides bounds checking by default. + Cons: Creates a new array copy of the original element, which can impact performance in certain situations. **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark. However, some modern JavaScript engines may use internal libraries or optimized implementations under the hood for certain operations (e.g., `slice()`). **Special JS Features/Syntax** This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard array indexing and method calls. **Other Alternatives** If you were to create similar benchmarks, you might consider exploring other options, such as: * Using a different data structure, like an object or a Set. * Adding more test cases for various edge cases (e.g., empty arrays, very large arrays). * Comparing performance with different algorithms or approaches for accessing/extracting elements. Overall, this benchmark provides a straightforward comparison between two basic methods of accessing the last element in an array.
Related benchmarks:
test123123121321
last array element
Array: get last item
Last Element
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?