Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance vs Elm builtin update
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign vs Current Elm Update vs Inline copying
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function _Utils_update(oldRecord, updatedFields) { var newRecord = {}; for (var key in oldRecord) { newRecord[key] = oldRecord[key]; } for (var key in updatedFields) { newRecord[key] = updatedFields[key]; } return newRecord; }
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world', moreData: 'foo bar' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world', moreData: 'foo bar' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
Current Elm Update
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world', moreData: 'foo bar' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = _Utils_update(firstObject, secondObject);
Inline copying
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world', moreData: 'foo bar' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {sampleData: firstObject.sampleData, moreData: secondObject.moreData }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign
Current Elm Update
Inline copying
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining what is tested on the provided JSON that represents the benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches to merge two objects: 1. **Using the spread operator**: This approach uses the spread operator (`...`) to merge two objects, where `firstObject` contains all properties and `secondObject` contains only a subset of those properties. 2. **Using Object.assign**: This approach uses the `Object.assign()` method to merge two objects. 3. **Current Elm Update**: This approach updates a copy of `firstObject` with the key-value pairs from `secondObject`. 4. **Inline copying**: This approach manually copies the value from `secondObject.moreData` into `finalObject.sampleData`. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these four approaches: * Using the spread operator (`...`) * Using Object.assign * Current Elm Update (the original implementation used in the test code) * Inline copying **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Using the Spread Operator`(`...)`**: * Pros: Concise, readable, and efficient way to merge objects. * Cons: May not be supported by older browsers or Node.js versions. 2. **Using Object.assign()**: * Pros: Widely supported across browsers and Node.js versions. * Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior if the source object is modified after assignment. 3. **Current Elm Update**: This approach is specific to the original implementation used in the test code. * Pros: Optimized for performance, taking advantage of the optimized `update` function. * Cons: Not a standard or widely supported method. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark uses Safari 14 as the browser, which may not be representative of other browsers' behavior. * The benchmark does not account for differences in memory allocation or caching between browsers. **Library and Syntax Used** The library used in this benchmark is none; however, it utilizes some specific JavaScript features: 1. **Rest Parameter (`...`)**: This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and allows for the spread operator to be used on object literals. 2. **Arrow Function**: The `update` function in the original implementation is an arrow function, which is a shorthand way of defining functions. **Alternatives** Alternative approaches to merging objects include: 1. **Lodash's `merge` function**: This popular utility library provides an efficient and readable way to merge objects. 2. **jQuery.extend()**: Another widely used utility library that offers an efficient way to merge objects. 3. **Manual Looping**: You can achieve the same result using a manual loop to copy properties from one object to another. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the original implementation used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign wrapper performance
Spread vs Object.assign (modify ) vs Object.assign (new)
object assign vs object spread on growing objects
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - Kien Nguyen
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?