Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs Array Push
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs Push
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread
var arr = [1, 2, 3] var other = [...arr, 4]
Push
var arr = [1, 2, 3] var other = arr.push(4)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and understand what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition provides two JavaScript code snippets that test different approaches to concatenate an array with another value or values. **Test Cases:** 1. **Spread (`"var arr = [1, 2, 3]\r\nvar other = [...arr, 4]"`)** In this case, the `...` operator is used to create a new array by spreading the elements of `arr`. This creates a new array with two elements: `[1, 2, 3, 4]`. The pros of using the spread operator are: * It's concise and readable. * It doesn't modify the original array. However, there might be a small performance overhead due to the creation of a new array. **Test Cases (continued):** 2. **Push (`"var arr = [1, 2, 3]\r\nvar other = arr.push(4)"`)** In this case, `push()` is called on the original array, which modifies the array in place and returns the updated length of the array. The pros of using `push()` are: * It's often faster than creating a new array. * It's more memory-efficient since it doesn't create a new array object. However, there might be some overhead due to the modification of the original array. **Library:** None of the test cases explicitly use any JavaScript libraries. The tests focus solely on the syntax and performance differences between using the spread operator and `push()`. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The `...` spread operator is a relatively modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's designed to create new arrays by spreading elements from existing arrays. This feature was not available prior to ES6, which might affect the performance and compatibility of these tests. **Other considerations:** When choosing between using the spread operator or `push()` for array concatenation, consider the following: * If you need to frequently concatenate small arrays, using `push()` might be more efficient. * If you're working with large datasets or need to ensure that the original array remains unchanged, using the spread operator is likely a better choice. **Alternatives:** Some alternative approaches for array concatenation include: 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: This method creates a new array by copying elements from an existing array. 2. **Array.prototype.reduce()**: This method can be used to concatenate arrays by reducing them to a single value. 3. **Array.prototype.slice() + Array.prototype.push()**: This approach involves creating a new array using `slice()` and then pushing the desired values onto it. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs in terms of performance, memory usage, and code readability. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested on MeasureThat.net!
Related benchmarks:
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
Javascript: Spread vs push
JS array spread operator vs push
Array .push() vs spread operator
Spread vs Push when adding into array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?