Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array fill method vs for loop__w
(version: 0)
Array fill method vs for loop performance validation
Comparing performance of:
For Loop fill vs Array Fill
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
For Loop fill
let len = 100; let arrayTest = []; arrayTest.length = len; for (let i = 0; i < len; ++i)arrayTest[i] = true;
Array Fill
let arrayTest = new Array(100); let len = arrayTest.length; for (let i = 0; i < len; ++i)arrayTest[i] = true;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
For Loop fill
Array Fill
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to populate an array with a fixed length: 1. **For Loop**: Using a traditional for loop to iterate over the array index and assign a value (in this case, `true`) to each element. 2. **Array Fill**: Using the `length` property of the array to set its size, and then using the `new Array()` constructor or assignment operator (`=[])` to initialize the array with a specified length. **Comparison** The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches on various JavaScript engines. **Pros and Cons** **For Loop:** Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Can be used in a variety of contexts Cons: * May incur overhead due to loop control logic * May have issues with array indexing and bounds checking **Array Fill:** Pros: * Fast and efficient, as it avoids loop control logic * Provides a convenient way to set the length of an array Cons: * Less intuitive for some developers * May not work in older browsers or environments that don't support modern JavaScript features. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark doesn't account for other factors like memory allocation, garbage collection, or caching. These can impact performance and should be considered when optimizing code. * The benchmark is specific to the Chrome 91 browser and Windows 8.1 operating system. Results may vary on different platforms and browsers. **Library and JavaScript Feature** There is no library being used in this benchmark, but it does rely on a modern JavaScript feature: the `let` and `const` declarations, which are part of the ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) standard. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to populate an array with a fixed length include: 1. Using the `Array.prototype.fill()` method 2. Utilizing a library like Lodash or Ramda for efficient array manipulation These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and compatibility with older browsers. **Additional Notes** The benchmark results show that the For Loop approach is slightly faster than the Array Fill approach on this specific test case. However, the difference is relatively small, and both approaches should be considered suitable for most use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Array fill method vs for loop
Array fill method vs for loop_
Array fill method vs for loop__
Array fill method vs for loop_q
Array fill method vs for loop small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?