Benchmark: delete vs use spread to omit property

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {
  a:1,
  b:2,
  c:3
}

Tests:

delete
delete obj.a
spread
obj = {...obj, a: undefined}
set undefined
obj.a = undefined

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
delete
spread
set undefined

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 119 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

delete

15.6M/s

set undefined

6.0M/s

spread

3.9M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ delete	15,580,771 Ops/sec
set undefined	6,024,737 Ops/sec
spread	3,877,920 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to compare three different approaches to "omitting" a property from an object:

1. `delete obj.a`
2. Using the spread operator (`obj = {...obj, a: undefined}`) to create a new object with the desired properties removed.
3. Setting the property to `undefined` directly (`obj.a = undefined`)

**Options being compared**

The three options are being compared in terms of performance, specifically the number of executions per second.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

1. `delete obj.a`:
	* Pros: Simple and concise.
	* Cons: Can be slower due to the dynamic nature of object property access.
2. Using the spread operator (`obj = {...obj, a: undefined}`):
	* Pros: More explicit and readable, as it creates a new object with the desired properties removed.
	* Cons: Can be slower due to the creation of a new object and the use of the spread operator.
3. Setting the property to `undefined` directly (`obj.a = undefined`):
	* Pros: Fast and efficient, as it simply sets the property value.
	* Cons: May not be as explicit or readable as the other two approaches.

**Library usage**

None of the provided benchmark definitions use any external libraries.

**Special JS feature/syntax**

The spread operator (`{...obj, a: undefined}`) is used in one of the test cases. This syntax is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES9).

**Other considerations**

* The `DevicePlatform` and `OperatingSystem` fields suggest that the benchmark is run on a desktop environment.
* The `ExecutionsPerSecond` field indicates the number of executions performed per second, which can be an indicator of performance.

**Alternatives**

If you wanted to create a similar benchmark, you could consider adding additional test cases, such as:

* Using the `delete` operator in combination with other operators (e.g., `delete obj.a && delete obj.b`)
* Comparing the performance of each approach on different types of objects (e.g., arrays, sets, etc.)
* Adding test cases for other ways to omit properties from an object (e.g., using a function or a library like Lodash)

delete vs use spread to omit property (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `delete vs spread vs set undefined`

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

delete

spread

set undefined

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

delete vs use spread to omit property (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: delete vs spread vs set undefined

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

delete

spread

set undefined

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `delete vs spread vs set undefined`