Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator111
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark compares two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: `Array.prototype.concat()` and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of: 1. `Array.prototype.concat()`: This is a traditional method for concatenating arrays, which was introduced in ECMAScript 5. 2. Spread Operator (`...`): This is a new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) for creating new arrays by spreading elements from an existing array. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **Array.prototype.concat()** Pros: * Widely supported across different browsers and Node.js versions. * Easy to understand and implement. * Can be used with any type of iterable (arrays, objects, etc.). Cons: * Performance: generally slower than the spread operator due to its overhead. * May not work as expected in some cases, such as concatenating arrays with non-enumerable properties. **Spread Operator (`...`)** Pros: * Fast and efficient. * Modern and widely adopted syntax. * Works well with modern JavaScript features like `rest parameters` and `destructuring`. Cons: * Requires ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) support, which may not be available in older browsers or Node.js versions. * May require additional configuration or imports for certain libraries. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that `Array.prototype.concat()` uses the `concat()` method on the global `Array` prototype, which may interact with other libraries that extend or modify this behavior. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows creating new arrays by spreading elements from an existing array. This syntax was designed to improve code readability and reduce the need for explicit array creation methods like `concat()`. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options: * Use `Array.prototype.reduce()` with the initial value set to the first element of the array: `arr.concat(arr[0])` * Use `Array.prototype.push()` multiple times: `arr.push.apply(arr, [1, 2]);` (note that this approach can be less efficient than using `concat()`) * Consider using specialized libraries like Lodash or Ramda, which provide optimized and flexible array concatenation methods. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches may vary depending on specific use cases and browser environments.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?