Benchmark: hamming distance again

Script Preparation code:

function hammingDistance(stringA, stringB) {
    if (stringA.length === stringB.length) {
        let count = 0
        for (char in stringA){
            if (stringA[char] !== stringB[char]) count++
        }
        return count
    } else {
        return 'strings are not the same length'
    }
}

function hammingDistanceForLoop(stringA, stringB) {
    let result = 0

    if (stringA.length == stringB.length) {

        for (let i = 0; i < stringA.length; i++) {
            if (stringA[i].toLowerCase() != stringB[i].toLowerCase()) {
                result++
            }
        }
        return result
    } else {
        throw new Error('Strings do not have equal length')
    }
}

Tests:

For In
hammingDistance('riverotter', 'roderofter')
For Loop
hammingDistanceForLoop('riverotter', 'roderofter')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
For In
For Loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

hamming distance again (version: 0)

test of hamming distance JS implementation

Comparing performance of: For In vs For Loop

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

For In

For Loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results