Benchmark: aasdfasdfas - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

native
var A = {a:1, b:2, c:3}; const ar = []; var n = 1000; for(var i=0; i<n; i++) ar.push(A); const copy = ar.map(object => ({ ...object }))
lodash
var A = {a:1, b:2, c:3}; const ar = []; var n = 1000; for(var i=0; i<n; i++) ar.push(A); _.cloneDeep(ar);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
native
lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**
The first part of the JSON data represents a benchmark definition, which consists of:

* `Name`: The name of the benchmark, but it seems like it was randomly generated and doesn't provide any meaningful information.
* `Description`: A brief description of the benchmark, but again, it's not very informative.
* `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These fields are empty, which means that no special setup or preparation code is required for this benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**
The second part of the JSON data consists of individual test cases, each representing a different approach to testing:

* **Native**: This test case uses native JavaScript syntax to push an object (`A`) into an array (`ar`) 1000 times and then clones the array using the `map` method.
	+ Pros:
		- Simple and straightforward implementation.
	+ Cons:
		- May not cover all edge cases or scenarios.
* **Lodash**: This test case uses the Lodash library to clone the array. Specifically, it uses the `_cloneDeep` function from the Lodash `lodash.js` module.
	+ Pros:
		- May provide more robust and comprehensive cloning functionality compared to native JavaScript.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires the Lodash library to be included in the benchmark.

**Library: Lodash**
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object merging, function composition, and more. The `_cloneDeep` function from Lodash is used to clone objects deeply, which can be useful when working with complex data structures.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**
There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in these benchmark cases.

**Alternative Approaches**
Other approaches that might be considered for this benchmark include:

* **ES6 ClonedArray**: This approach would use the `ClonedArray` class from the ECMAScript 2015 standard (ES6) to clone the array.
	+ Pros:
		- Uses the standardized `ClonedArray` API, which may provide better performance and more comprehensive cloning functionality compared to native JavaScript.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires support for ES6 features in the benchmark environment.
* **Other libraries or frameworks**: Other libraries or frameworks like Ramda, Immutable.js, or Vue's `Array.prototype.map()` with a custom implementation might also be considered as alternatives.

In summary, these benchmark cases are testing two approaches to cloning an array: one using native JavaScript syntax and another using the Lodash library. The test results will provide insights into which approach is faster and more efficient in terms of CPU cycles executed per second.

Related benchmarks:

aasdfasdfas (version: 0)

a

Comparing performance of: native vs lodash

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

native

lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):