Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
rest vs array
(version: 0)
rest parameter vs array
Comparing performance of:
array Param vs rest Param
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
arrayParam = (a) => {console.log(a)} restParam = (...a) => {console.log(a)}
Tests:
array Param
const arr1 = [1,2,3,4,5] arrayParam(arr1);
rest Param
restParam(1,2,3,4,5)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array Param
rest Param
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests two approaches to passing arguments: using an array (`arrayParam`) and using rest parameters (`restParam`). **What is tested?** The test compares the performance of two functions: 1. `arrayParam`: A function that takes an array as an argument, which is then logged to the console. 2. `restParam`: A function that uses rest parameters (a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015) to take multiple arguments, which are then logged to the console. **Options compared** The benchmark compares two options for passing arguments: 1. **Array**: Using an array as an argument, where each element is passed individually. 2. **Rest parameters**: Using rest parameters to pass multiple arguments in a concise way. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Array**: * Pros: More explicit, predictable behavior, easier to understand for developers familiar with arrays. * Cons: May lead to slower performance due to the overhead of creating an array and iterating over its elements. 2. **Rest parameters**: * Pros: More concise and expressive, can reduce code size and improve readability. * Cons: May introduce less obvious behavior or errors if not used carefully. In general, rest parameters are a more modern and efficient way to pass multiple arguments in JavaScript, but they may require more careful consideration of their implications on performance and code maintainability. **Library and purpose** There is no library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that some libraries (e.g., Lodash) provide utility functions for working with arrays and rest parameters. **Special JS feature or syntax** The benchmark uses rest parameters (`...a`) introduced in ECMAScript 2015. Rest parameters allow a function to accept a variable number of arguments, which are collected into an array called the "rest parameter." This allows for more concise code and easier handling of multiple arguments. **Other alternatives** In general, other ways to pass arguments include: 1. **Spread operator**: `arrayParam([1,2,3,4,5])` or `restParam(...[1,2,3,4,5])` 2. **Array destructuring**: Instead of using an array and rest parameters, some developers use array destructuring to assign values from an array to separate variables. 3. **Function composition**: Some developers might choose to compose functions to achieve the desired behavior. However, these alternatives are less commonly used in practice compared to array or rest parameters. In summary, MeasureThat.net's benchmark provides a simple and clear way to compare the performance of two approaches: using an array versus using rest parameters for passing arguments. The results can help developers understand which approach might be more suitable for their specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Array .push() vs .unshift()
Spread operator vs array push
Array.from() vs []
Add new element to array (preparation): push vs destructuring vs bracket access
Array .push() vs .unshift() |
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?