Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
pagination
(version: 1)
paging test
Comparing performance of:
js vs jquery
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script> <script src="http://www.kitababak.com/js/twbs-pagination/jquery.twbsPagination.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="http://yediverendukkan.com/assets/js/pagination.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <div class="row"> <div class="col-12"> <div class="table-responsive"> <nav aria-label="Page navigation"> <ul class="pagination" id="pagination"> </ul> </nav> </div> </div> </div>
Tests:
js
const pagination = new Pagination({ element: '#pagination', totalPages: parseInt(25), visiblePages: 10, startPage: parseInt(3), next: true, prev: true, last: true, first: true });
jquery
$('#pagination').twbsPagination({ totalPages: parseInt(25), initiateStartPageClick: false, visiblePages: 10, startPage: parseInt(3), next:"<i class=\"fas fa-chevron-right\"></i>", prev:"<i class=\"fas fa-chevron-left\"></i>", lastClass:"d-none", firstClass:"d-none", onPageClick: function (event, page) { const url = window.location.href.split('?')[0]; const queryString = window.location.search; var urlParams = new URLSearchParams(queryString); urlParams.set('page', page); window.location.href = url+"?"+urlParams; } });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
js
jquery
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is tested, compared, and analyzed. **Benchmark Overview** The `pagination` benchmark measures the performance of two JavaScript libraries: `jquery.twbsPagination` and a custom implementation using the `$` function. The benchmark tests how quickly these libraries can generate pagination controls for a given dataset. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"js"`**: This test case uses the custom implementation in the `Benchmark Definition` script. It creates an instance of the `Pagination` class, which is not shown in the provided code. The `Pagination` class seems to be a simple pagination library that generates pagination controls based on user input. 2. **"jquery"`**: This test case uses the `jquery.twbsPagination` library. It initializes the plugin on a DOM element with the ID `pagination`. **Library Analysis** 1. **`jquery.twbsPagination`**: * Purpose: A jQuery plugin for creating responsive and customizable pagination controls. * Pros: + Easy to use and integrate with existing jQuery codebases. + Offers customization options, such as styling and layout control. * Cons: + May require additional dependencies or setup (e.g., Bootstrap). 2. **Custom `Pagination` implementation**: * Purpose: A custom JavaScript library for generating pagination controls. * Pros: + Can be optimized for specific use cases or performance requirements. * Cons: + Requires more manual setup and configuration compared to jQuery plugins. **Comparison** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: 1. **`jquery.twbsPagination`**: The plugin's execution speed, as measured by the number of executions per second (EpS). 2. **Custom `Pagination` implementation**: The custom implementation's EpS. **Considerations** * **Browser and Device support**: Both libraries are likely to work across various browsers and devices, but the custom implementation may require more testing and optimization for specific platforms. * **Performance overhead**: The jQuery plugin may introduce additional performance overhead due to its dependency on Bootstrap or other external resources. * **Customization and extensibility**: The custom implementation offers more flexibility in terms of customization, while the jQuery plugin's options may be limited. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative pagination libraries or implementations: 1. **Bootstrap Pagination**: A part of the popular Bootstrap CSS framework, offering a simple and customizable pagination component. 2. **Pure JavaScript Libraries**: Other custom or third-party libraries like `react-pagination`, `material-ui-pagenation`, or `pagination-js` might offer varying trade-offs in terms of performance, customization, and complexity. When choosing a pagination library or implementation, consider factors such as your project's requirements, existing codebase, and desired level of customization.
Related benchmarks:
jquery speed class filter
jQuery text() vs html()
jQuery.detach
filter vs each
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?