Benchmark: Binary to Integer

Script Preparation code:

var truthyBool = true;
var falsyBool = false;

//Currently set to -1, but will change to 1 (truthyNum) and 0 (falsyNum).
var truthyNum = -1;
var falsyNum = -1;

Tests:

If statement
if(truthyBool === true){ truthyNum = 1; } else{ truthyNum = 0; } if(falsyBool === true){ falsyNum = 1; } else{ falsyNum = 0; }
Ternary
truthyNum = truthyBool ? 1 : 0; falsyNum = falsyBool ? 1 : 0;
Unary
truthyNum = +truthyBool; falsyNum = +falsyBool;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
If statement
Ternary
Unary

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested in the Benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is testing the conversion of binary numbers to integers using three different approaches:

1. **If statement**: This approach uses an if-else statement to evaluate the truthiness of the input boolean values.
2. **Ternary operator**: This approach uses a ternary operator to concisely express the same logic as the if-statement approach.
3. **Unary operator**: This approach uses the unary plus operator (`+`) to convert the input boolean values to integers.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of these three approaches on a variety of inputs:

* `truthyBool` and `falsyBool`: These are two boolean variables set to `true` and `false`, respectively.
* `truthyNum` and `falsyNum`: These are two integer variables initialized with values -1, which will be updated based on the input boolean values.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **If statement**: This approach is more explicit and easier to understand for developers familiar with traditional if-else statements.
	* Pros: Easy to read and maintain, no dependence on special operators or syntax.
	* Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of the conditional checks.
2. **Ternary operator**: This approach is concise and can be more efficient than traditional if-else statements.
	* Pros: More compact code, potentially faster execution.
	* Cons: Can be less readable for developers unfamiliar with ternary operators.
3. **Unary operator**: This approach uses a simple and intuitive syntax to convert boolean values to integers.
	* Pros: Extremely concise and potentially fast, no dependence on special operators or syntax.
	* Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable due to its brevity.

**Library**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's likely that the benchmarks are running on a JavaScript engine that provides native support for these operators and data types.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard if-else statements and ternary operator. The use of unary plus (`+`) to convert boolean values to integers is a common idiom in JavaScript, but it's not a feature specific to that language.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for converting binary numbers to integers could include:

* Using bitwise operators (e.g., `&`, `|`, `^`) to perform the conversion.
* Writing custom functions or methods to perform the conversion.
* Utilizing specialized libraries or frameworks that provide optimized implementations of this operation.

It's worth noting that the specific use case and requirements would influence the choice of approach. In general, for most cases, the ternary operator approach is a good compromise between conciseness and readability.

Related benchmarks:

Binary to Integer (version: 0)

Testing binary to integer conversions

Comparing performance of: If statement vs Ternary vs Unary

Created: 9 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

If statement

Ternary

Unary

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):