Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
string.Empty as ""
(version: 0)
string.Empty as "" speed test
Comparing performance of:
string.Empty + "Ok" vs "" + "Ok" vs string.Empty Length + 42 vs "".Length + 42
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
string.Empty + "Ok"
var result = String.Emty + "Ok"
"" + "Ok"
var result = "" + "Ok"
string.Empty Length + 42
var result = String.Length + 42
"".Length + 42
var result = "".Length + 42
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
string.Empty + "Ok"
"" + "Ok"
string.Empty Length + 42
"".Length + 42
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that defines a simple JavaScript expression to be evaluated. In this case, there are four different expressions: 1. `var result = String.Empty + "Ok"` 2. `var result = "" + "Ok"` 3. `var result = String.Length + 42` 4. `var result = "" .Length + 42` These expressions test the performance of concatenating strings using different approaches. **String Concatenation** The benchmark tests four ways to concatenate strings: 1. **Using the `+` operator**: This is a common way to concatenate strings in JavaScript. The `Empty` property of the `String` object is not actually an empty string, as it seems to be indicated by the name; instead, this test case checks how fast `"Ok"` is concatenated with either an empty string literal (`""`) or the result of accessing the `Length` property of a non-existent `String` object. 2. **Using the unary `+` operator**: This syntax is used to convert a value to a number. In this case, it's used to concatenate an empty string (`""`) with `"Ok"`. 3. **Accessing the `Length` property of an object**: This test case checks how fast the result of accessing the `Length` property of an object (in this case, a non-existent `String` object) is concatenated with the integer value `42`. **Library and Syntax** The benchmark uses the following library: * No explicit library is mentioned, but it's likely that the `String` object is being used as-is, which means it's being used from the built-in JavaScript language. No special JS features or syntax are explicitly used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of the unary `+` operator for string concatenation is not a recommended practice in modern JavaScript development. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Using the `+` operator**: * Pros: Simple and widely supported. * Cons: Can lead to unexpected results if used with non-string values. 2. **Using the unary `+` operator**: * Pros: Fast, as it's optimized for number concatenation. * Cons: Less readable and can be confusing for other developers. 3. **Accessing the `Length` property of an object**: * Pros: Not commonly used, so might be a good option for avoiding potential issues. * Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or environments. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative ways to concatenate strings in JavaScript, consider using template literals (introduced in ES6): ```javascript var result = `${""}`; // OR var result = `${42}`; ``` These provide a more readable and efficient way to concatenate strings.
Related benchmarks:
char index vs charAt()
char index vs charAt() for non-zero index
char index vs charAt() vs slice() with Object
char index vs charAt() for the first character
Last char in a string: char index vs charAt() vs slice() vs at()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?