Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash remove vs native filter
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs native
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var max = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million) var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i <= max; i++) { arr.push(i); }
Tests:
lodash
_.remove(arr, item => item === 890047);
native
arr = arr.filter(item => item !== 890047);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
8 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/139.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 139 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
lodash
3.8 Ops/sec
native
5.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to remove a specific element from an array: using the Lodash library's `remove` function versus native JavaScript's `filter` method. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Lodash (`_.remove`)**: This approach uses the Lodash library, which provides a utility function for removing elements from arrays. 2. **Native JavaScript (`arr.filter`)**: This approach uses native JavaScript's built-in `filter` method to remove elements from an array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Lodash (`_.remove`)**: + Pros: - Easier to read and maintain, as it's a single function call. - May be more efficient due to optimized implementation by the Lodash library. + Cons: - Requires importing the Lodash library, which may add overhead. - May have additional dependencies, such as polyfills or transpilation steps. * **Native JavaScript (`arr.filter`)**: + Pros: - No additional dependencies or imports required. - Native implementation is typically faster and more lightweight. + Cons: - Can be less readable due to the need to specify a callback function. - May require additional setup, such as defining the callback function. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, and more. In this benchmark, the `remove` function from Lodash is used to remove elements from an array based on a predicate (a function that returns a boolean value). The `remove` function takes two arguments: the array to modify and the element to remove. **Test Case: Removing a Specific Element** In both test cases, the goal is to remove the specific element with index 890047 from the array. However, the implementation differs: * In the Lodash approach (`_.remove(arr, item => item === 890047)`), the `item` variable represents the element to be removed, and the predicate function simply checks if this element matches the target value (in this case, 890047). The `_.remove` function takes care of removing the correct element from the array. * In the native JavaScript approach (`arr.filter(item => item !== 890047)`), an explicit filter callback function is used to remove elements that do not match the condition (`item !== 890047`). This approach requires manual iteration and comparison, which may be slower than the optimized implementation provided by Lodash. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two basic approaches to array manipulation: using a utility library versus native JavaScript methods. **Other Alternatives** If you'd like to explore alternative approaches, here are some options: * Using `arr.splice()` instead of `_.remove()`: This would involve removing the element at the specified index from the array and then shifting all subsequent elements down. * Using a different utility library (e.g., Underscore.js or Moment.js): These libraries may provide similar functions for working with arrays, but their implementation might differ. * Implementing your own custom function: You could write a simple loop-based implementation to remove the element from the array, which would likely be slower than the optimized native JavaScript approach.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.js versus Native
Lodash.filter vs Lodash.without
Lodash.filter vs Lodash.without vs array.filter
Lodash filter VS native filter (with Lodash actually loaded)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?