Benchmark: JSON.srtingify vs react-fast-compare vs _.isEqual ss

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/react-fast-compare@3.2.0/index.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.a = {
    hello: "user",
  	hello2: 123,
  	hello3: [1]
};

window.b = {
    hello: "user",
  	hello2: 123,
  	hello3: [3]
};

Tests:

JSON.stringify
JSON.stringify(window.a) === JSON.stringify(window.b);
react-fast-compare
equal(window.a, window.b)
lodash
_.isEqual(a,b)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JSON.stringify
react-fast-compare
lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what is being tested in the provided JSON.

The benchmark is comparing three different approaches to compare two objects or values:

1. **JSON.stringify**: This method converts an object into a string, which can be compared for equality. However, this approach has some limitations:
	* It can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of converting objects to strings.
	* It may not work as expected if the object contains functions, undefined values, or other special types that cannot be serialized to strings.
	* The resulting string representation of an object might not accurately reflect its original structure or contents.
2. **React-fast-compare** (a JavaScript library): This library provides a way to compare two objects or arrays using a custom comparison function. Its pros:
	* It is specifically designed for comparing complex data structures and can handle many edge cases.
	* It allows for a fine-grained control over the comparison process, making it suitable for specific use cases.
	* However, its cons:
		+ It introduces an additional dependency on the library, which may not be desirable in all situations.
		+ Its performance might vary depending on the size and complexity of the data being compared.
3. **Lodash's _.isEqual** (a popular utility library): This function provides a way to compare two values for equality. Its pros:
	* It is widely used and well-maintained, ensuring stability and consistency across different browsers and environments.
	* It can handle many common edge cases and special types, making it a reliable choice for general-purpose comparisons.
	* However, its cons:
		+ Like React-fast-compare, it introduces an additional dependency on the library.
		+ Its performance might not be as optimized as native implementations or custom solutions.

The benchmark is designed to measure the execution speed of these three approaches across different browsers and devices. By comparing their performance under various conditions, users can determine which approach best suits their specific needs.

In terms of special JavaScript features or syntax, none are explicitly mentioned in this example. However, if you're interested in exploring other advanced concepts like async/await, promises, or modern ES6+ features, I'd be happy to help with that as well!

Related benchmarks:

JSON.srtingify vs react-fast-compare vs _.isEqual ss (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JSON.stringify vs react-fast-compare vs lodash

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JSON.stringify

react-fast-compare

lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):