Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test to string lodash and js
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
test toString JS n = 10000 vs test toString js n = 100000 vs test toString lodash n = 10000 vs test toString lodash n = 100000
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var n4 = 10000; var n5 = 100000; var array4 = []; var array5 = []; for(let i = n4; i > 0; i--) { array4.push(i); } for(let i = n5; i > 0; i--) { array5.push(i); } function toStringLodash(array) { _.toString(array); } function toStringJS(array) { array.toString(); }
Tests:
test toString JS n = 10000
toStringJS(array4);
test toString js n = 100000
toStringLodash(array5);
test toString lodash n = 10000
toStringLodash(array4);
test toString lodash n = 100000
toStringLodash(array5);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test toString JS n = 10000
test toString js n = 100000
test toString lodash n = 10000
test toString lodash n = 100000
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring JavaScript performance can be a complex task, but I'll break it down for you. **What is tested?** The provided JSON defines two functions: `toStringJS` and `toStringLodash`. Both functions take an array as input and attempt to convert it into a string. The main difference between them lies in the library used: * `toStringJS(array)` uses the built-in `Array.prototype.toString()` method. * `toStringLodash(array)` relies on the popular JavaScript utility library, Lodash. **Options compared:** The benchmark compares two approaches to achieve this conversion: 1. **Built-in Array.prototype.toString()**: This approach leverages the optimized implementation provided by JavaScript's built-in functions. It is generally faster and more efficient since it doesn't require additional dependencies or processing. 2. **Lodash library (_.toString(array))**: The Lodash library provides a convenient way to achieve string conversion, but it comes with an additional overhead due to its complexity, size, and runtime. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **Built-in Array.prototype.toString()**: * Pros: * Faster execution speed * No dependencies required (just JavaScript) * Optimized by the browser's engine * Cons: * Limited control over the conversion process * May not work as expected with certain types of data 2. **Lodash library (.toString(array))**: * Pros: * Provides more flexibility and control over the conversion process * Works well with a wide range of data types * Easier to read and maintain due to its concise syntax * Cons: * Slower execution speed compared to the built-in approach * Requires an additional dependency (the Lodash library) **Other considerations:** * The benchmark results are affected by various factors, such as: * Browser version and engine used * Device platform and operating system * Available memory and processing power **Alternative approaches:** If you're interested in exploring other options, consider the following alternatives: 1. **Using a custom implementation**: You could create your own custom function for string conversion, taking into account specific requirements or data types. 2. **Native modules (WebAssembly)**: WebAssembly provides native code compilation and execution, which can potentially lead to better performance for certain use cases. 3. **Third-party libraries (e.g., Stringify.js)**: Libraries like Stringify.js offer optimized string conversion functions with minimal overhead. Please note that the choice of approach depends on your specific needs, requirements, and constraints.
Related benchmarks:
Obj to Array
native vs lodash
lodash vs for-of vs forEach5453
lodash vs for-of vs forEach vs map v2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?