Benchmark: Map Value Iteration

Script Preparation code:

var map = new Map(Object.entries({
  a: 1,
  b: 2,
  c: 3,
  d: 4,
  e: 5,
  f: 6,
  g: 7,
  h: 8,
  i: 9,
  j: 10,
  k: 11,
  l: 12,
  m: 13,
  n: 14,
  o: 15,
  p: 16,
  q: 17,
  r: 18,
  s: 19,
  t: 20,
  u: 21,
  v: 22,
  w: 23,
  x: 24,
  y: 25,
  z: 26
}));

var values = Array.from(map.values());
var entries = Array.from(map.entries());

Tests:

map.values()
let total = 0; for(const i of map.values()) total += i;
values array
let total = 0; for(const i of values) total += i;
entries array
let total = 0; for(const [k, i] of entries) total += i;
values.values()
let total = 0; for(const i of values.values()) total += i;
values length-based
let total = 0; const length = values.length; for(let i = 0; i < length; i++) total += values[i];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
map.values()
values array
entries array
values.values()
values length-based

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

values.values()

23.9M/s

values array

23.8M/s

entries array

17.3M/s

values length-based

15.3M/s

map.values()

10.9M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ values.values()	23,869,054 Ops/sec
values array	23,785,446 Ops/sec
entries array	17,294,300 Ops/sec
values length-based	15,343,110 Ops/sec
map.values()	10,853,819 Ops/sec

Map Value Iteration (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `map.values() vs values array vs entries array vs values.values() vs values length-based`

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

map.values()

values array

entries array

values.values()

values length-based

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Map Value Iteration (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: map.values() vs values array vs entries array vs values.values() vs values length-based

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

map.values()

values array

entries array

values.values()

values length-based

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `map.values() vs values array vs entries array vs values.values() vs values length-based`