Benchmark: speed test lodash js

speed test lodash js (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `iterate lodash n = 1000 vs iterate lodash n = 10000 vs iterate lodash n = 100000 vs iterate lodash n = 1000000 vs iterate lodash n = 10000000 vs iterate ts n = 1000 vs iterate ts n = 10000 vs iterate ts n = 100000 vs iterate ts n = 1000000 vs iterate ts n = 10000000`

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var n3 = 1000;
var n4 = 10000;
var n5 = 100000;
var n6 = 1000000;
var n7 = 10000000;
var array3 = [];
var array4 = [];
var array5 = [];
var array6 = [];
var array7 = [];
for(let i = 0; i < n3; i++) {
 array3.push(i); 
}
for(let i = 0; i < n4; i++) {
 array4.push(i); 
}
for(let i = 0; i < n5; i++) {
 array5.push(i); 
}
for(let i = 0; i < n6; i++) {
 array6.push(i); 
}
for(let i = 0; i < n7; i++) {
 array7.push(i); 
}

function iterateLodash(arr) { 
    _.forEach(arr, (n) => {
      n = n + 1;
    });
}

function iterateTS(arr) { 
    arr.forEach((n) => {
      n = n + 1;
    });
}

Tests:

iterate lodash n = 1000
iterateLodash(array3);
iterate lodash n = 10000
iterateLodash(array4);
iterate lodash n = 100000
iterateLodash(array5);
iterate lodash n = 1000000
iterateLodash(array6);
iterate lodash n = 10000000
iterateLodash(array7);
iterate ts n = 1000
iterateTS(array3);
iterate ts n = 10000
iterateTS(array4);
iterate ts n = 100000
iterateTS(array5);
iterate ts n = 1000000
iterateTS(array6);
iterate ts n = 10000000
iterateTS(array7);

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 5 runs

iterate ts n = 1000

3.0M/s

iterate ts n = 10000

280K/s

iterate lodash n = 1000

220K/s

iterate ts n = 100000

27K/s

iterate lodash n = 10000

23K/s

iterate lodash n = 100000

2K/s

iterate ts n = 1000000

963/s

iterate lodash n = 1000000

233/s

iterate ts n = 10000000

96/s

iterate lodash n = 10000000

25/s

Fastest: iterate ts n = 1000 (122063.4x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ iterate ts n = 1000: 3,013,085 ops/sec
• iterate ts n = 10000: 280,011 ops/sec
• iterate lodash n = 1000: 219,614 ops/sec
• iterate ts n = 100000: 26,606 ops/sec
• iterate lodash n = 10000: 22,786 ops/sec
• iterate lodash n = 100000: 2,221 ops/sec
• iterate ts n = 1000000: 963 ops/sec
• iterate lodash n = 1000000: 233 ops/sec
• iterate ts n = 10000000: 96 ops/sec
• iterate lodash n = 10000000: 25 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
iterate lodash n = 1000
iterate lodash n = 10000
iterate lodash n = 100000
iterate lodash n = 1000000
iterate lodash n = 10000000
iterate ts n = 1000
iterate ts n = 10000
iterate ts n = 100000
iterate ts n = 1000000
iterate ts n = 10000000

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

iterate ts n = 1000

3.0M/s

iterate ts n = 10000

263K/s

iterate lodash n = 1000

208K/s

iterate ts n = 100000

22K/s

iterate lodash n = 10000

21K/s

iterate lodash n = 100000

2K/s

iterate ts n = 1000000

862/s

iterate lodash n = 1000000

214/s

iterate ts n = 10000000

88/s

iterate lodash n = 10000000

24/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ iterate ts n = 1000	3,013,085 Ops/sec
iterate ts n = 10000	262,692 Ops/sec
iterate lodash n = 1000	207,696 Ops/sec
iterate ts n = 100000	21,707 Ops/sec
iterate lodash n = 10000	21,144 Ops/sec
iterate lodash n = 100000	2,049 Ops/sec
iterate ts n = 1000000	862 Ops/sec
iterate lodash n = 1000000	214 Ops/sec
iterate ts n = 10000000	88 Ops/sec
iterate lodash n = 10000000	24 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

A large JSON array of browser execution data!

After examining the data, I'll highlight some interesting trends and observations:

**1. Test names**: The tests being executed are "iterate ts n = X" and "iterate lodash n = X", where X is a varying number (1000 to 10000000). This suggests that these tests are likely related to benchmarking JavaScript libraries or frameworks.

**2. Browser distribution**: The majority of the data points come from Chrome 127, with some results also shown for other browsers like Firefox and Safari. However, it's essential to note that this data is specific to a single version of each browser (127).

**3. OS and device platform**: All results are reported on Mac OS X 10.15.7, indicating that the testing environment is consistent across all test runs.

**4. Execution rates**: The execution rates vary significantly, ranging from ~20 executions per second for "iterate lodash n = 10000000" to over 270,000 executions per second for "iterate ts n = 10000". This suggests a significant performance difference between the tests being executed.

**5. Scaling behavior**: As the input size (n) increases, the execution rate decreases, indicating that the test becomes more computationally expensive or slower. However, there might be some level of asymptotic behavior, where the execution time grows at a certain rate as n approaches infinity.

These observations are based on a limited dataset and may not be representative of the entire population of tests. Further analysis would require additional data points to draw more definitive conclusions.

Do you have any specific questions about this data or its interpretation?

speed test lodash js (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: iterate lodash n = 1000 vs iterate lodash n = 10000 vs iterate lodash n = 100000 vs iterate lodash n = 1000000 vs iterate lodash n = 10000000 vs iterate ts n = 1000 vs iterate ts n = 10000 vs iterate ts n = 100000 vs iterate ts n = 1000000 vs iterate ts n = 10000000

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

iterate lodash n = 1000

iterate lodash n = 10000

iterate lodash n = 100000

iterate lodash n = 1000000

iterate lodash n = 10000000

iterate ts n = 1000

iterate ts n = 10000

iterate ts n = 100000

iterate ts n = 1000000

iterate ts n = 10000000

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `iterate lodash n = 1000 vs iterate lodash n = 10000 vs iterate lodash n = 100000 vs iterate lodash n = 1000000 vs iterate lodash n = 10000000 vs iterate ts n = 1000 vs iterate ts n = 10000 vs iterate ts n = 100000 vs iterate ts n = 1000000 vs iterate ts n = 10000000`