Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test5 delete
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
delete o.p vs delete o["p"] vs o.p = undefined vs o["p"] = undefined; vs o.p = null vs o["p"] = null
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var o = { p: "p" };
Tests:
delete o.p
delete o.p;
delete o["p"]
delete o["p"];
o.p = undefined
o.p = undefined;
o["p"] = undefined;
o["p"] = undefined;
o.p = null
o.p = null;
o["p"] = null
o["p"] = null;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
delete o.p
delete o["p"]
o.p = undefined
o["p"] = undefined;
o.p = null
o["p"] = null
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript deletions can be an interesting and useful benchmark. **Overview** The provided JSON represents a set of test cases that measure the performance of deleting properties from an object in JavaScript. The tests compare different approaches to delete properties, including `delete`, bracket notation (`[]`), assigning a value of `undefined`, or `null`. **Options Compared** The following options are compared: 1. **`delete o.p;`**: This is the traditional way of deleting a property using the `delete` keyword. 2. **`o[\"p\"] = undefined;`**: This method uses bracket notation to access and delete the property, followed by assigning `undefined` to it. 3. **`o.p = null;`**: This approach assigns `null` to the property instead of deleting it. **Pros and Cons** 1. **`delete o.p;`**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, as it only updates the property's metadata. * Cons: May not work in all cases, such as when the property is accessed or modified after deletion. 2. **`o[\"p\"] = undefined;`**: * Pros: Works even if the property is accessed or modified after deletion. * Cons: May be slower due to the extra operation of assigning `undefined`. 3. **`o.p = null;`**: * Pros: Ensures the property is no longer accessible, which can be desirable in some cases. * Cons: Assigns a new value, which may not be necessary or intended. **Other Considerations** When dealing with objects in JavaScript, it's essential to consider how properties are stored and retrieved. In modern browsers, object properties are stored as hash tables (also known as maps), which provide fast lookup and deletion of properties. However, the behavior of `delete` can vary depending on the context, such as: * When deleting a property from an object that is being accessed or modified. * When the deleted property has already been assigned a new value. **Library Usage** None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. The tests only rely on built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. However, it's worth noting that bracket notation (`[]`) is a common way to access properties in JavaScript, and `delete` can be used with object literals, dot notation, or bracket notation. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for deleting properties from objects include: * Using the `Object.keys()` method to iterate over property names and delete them individually. * Utilizing the `JSON.stringify()` method to serialize the object and then parse it without specific properties. * Leveraging modern JavaScript features like `for...in` loops, which provide a more comprehensive way of iterating over an object's properties. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics or use cases compared to the options tested in the benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
delete test
test delete
test2 delete
test3 delete
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?