Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test2 delete
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
delete o.p vs o.p = undefined
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var o = { p1: "p1", p2: "p2" };
Tests:
delete o.p
delete o.p1; delete o.p2;
o.p = undefined
o.p1 = o.p2 = undefined;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
delete o.p
o.p = undefined
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two test cases: 1. `delete o.p1; delete o.p2;` (Test Name: `delete o.p`) 2. `o.p1 = o.p2 = undefined;` (Test Name: `o.p = undefined`) The script preparation code for both tests is the same: ```javascript var o = { p1: "p1", p2: "p2" }; ``` This creates an object `o` with two properties, `p1` and `p2`, initialized with string values. **What's being tested?** These benchmarks test the performance of JavaScript's deletion mechanisms for objects. The tests compare two different approaches: 1. **Delete individual properties**: `delete o.p1; delete o.p2;` This approach deletes each property individually, which may lead to slower execution due to the overhead of deleting a single property and then checking if it exists. 2. **Delete entire object**: `o.p1 = o.p2 = undefined;` **Options compared** The two test cases compare: * Delete individual properties (Test Name: `delete o.p`) * Delete entire object (Test Name: `o.p = undefined`) **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Delete individual properties (Test Name: delete o.p)**: * Pros: + Less memory is freed when deleting individual properties. + May be faster due to less overhead. * Cons: + Requires two separate `delete` statements, which can lead to slower execution. 2. **Delete entire object (Test Name: o.p = undefined)**: * Pros: + Faster execution since only one operation is required to delete the entire object. * Cons: + More memory is freed when deleting the entire object. + May lead to slower performance if the object is very large. **Other considerations** The benchmark measures the number of executions per second for each test case, which indicates the speed at which the JavaScript engine can execute these operations. A higher value indicates faster execution. **Library and special features used** No libraries or special JavaScript features are mentioned in the provided code or documentation. **Alternatives** If you want to create a similar benchmark, consider adding additional test cases that cover other aspects of object deletion, such as: * Deleting properties with different data types (e.g., `delete o.p1 = "string";`) * Deleting properties using `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call()` * Comparing the performance of different JavaScript engines or versions Keep in mind that benchmarking is an iterative process, and you may need to refine your tests and adjust your expectations based on the results.
Related benchmarks:
Delete for
delete test
test delete
test3 delete
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?