Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread v assign
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} finalObject.sampleData = 'Hello world' finalObject.moreData = 'foo bar'
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into measuring and analyzing JavaScript performance benchmarks. **Benchmark Context** The provided benchmark definition and test cases are used to measure the performance difference between two approaches: using the spread operator (`...`) and `Object.assign()` when merging objects in JavaScript. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Using the spread operator (`...`)**: This approach uses the rest syntax to extract properties from an object and merge them into a new object. 2. **Using `Object.assign()`**: This approach uses the `assign()` method of the `Object` prototype to merge properties from two objects. **Pros and Cons** ### Using the Spread Operator (`...`) Pros: * Concise and readable syntax * No need to define an empty object as a target for assignment * Works with array-like objects (e.g., `Array.from()` or `Map`) in addition to plain objects Cons: * Requires support for ES6+ features (rest syntax) * May incur additional overhead due to function call and property iteration ### Using `Object.assign()` Pros: * Wide browser support, including older browsers that don't implement the spread operator * No additional function call or property iteration overhead * More traditional and familiar API Cons: * Requires defining an empty object as a target for assignment (`const result = {};`) * Less concise syntax compared to using the spread operator **Library and Special JS Features** No libraries are used in these benchmark definitions. **Special JS Feature** The `...` rest syntax is used to extract properties from objects, which is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript (introduced in ES6). This syntax allows for more concise and expressive object merging. The `Object.assign()` method has been part of the JavaScript language since its inception. **Other Alternatives** Alternative approaches to merge objects could include: 1. Using the `merge()` function from libraries like Lodash or Ramda 2. Recursively merging objects using template literals or string concatenation 3. Using a custom implementation, such as iterating over object properties and assigning values However, these alternatives are not typically used in everyday JavaScript development due to their potential overhead, complexity, or browser compatibility issues. In conclusion, the benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between two common approaches to merging objects: using the spread operator (`...`) and `Object.assign()`. The results can help developers optimize their code for better performance and readability.
Related benchmarks:
my Object.assign-vs-Spread
Object.assign vs spread operator - 1
Spread Operator: Array
Spread Operator: Object
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?