Benchmark: forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for-ali

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 12345; i++) {
  arr[i] = i;
}

function someFn(i) {
  return (i * 3 * 8 / 1200 * 0.002 / 40 * 0.2);
}

var sumForEach = 0,
  sumReduce = 0,
  sumMap = 0,
  sumFilter = 0,
  sumFor = 0;

Tests:

forEach
arr.forEach(item => sumForEach += someFn(item));
reduce
sumReduce = arr.reduce((lastValue, item) => { return sumReduce += item; });
map
arr.map(item => (sumMap += someFn(item)));
filter
arr.filter(item => (sumFilter += someFn(item)));
for
for (var j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) { sumFor += arr[j]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
forEach
reduce
map
filter
for

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for tiny
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for v2292U9I2JIR2J0IEJ02JE0IJ20EJ
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for (slightly optimized for, fixed fn)
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for (slightly optimized for (fixed))

forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for-ali (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

forEach

reduce

map

filter

for

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results