Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
TEST BNGSSaaa
(version: 0)
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
Comparing performance of:
VERSI STANDAR vs VERSI KOMPRESS
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<html> <head> <title>Operation VS Character</title> </head> <body> <div id='el-target'> TEST </div> </body> </html>
Tests:
VERSI STANDAR
(()=>{ document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; document.getElementById("el-target").innerHTML = "TEST"; })();
VERSI KOMPRESS
(()=>{ const getByiD = (id)=>{ return document.getElementById(id); }; const setInner = (el, content)=>{ el.innerHTML = content; }; setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); setInner(getByiD("el-target", "TEST")); })();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
VERSI STANDAR
VERSI KOMPRESS
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JavaScript features, and alternative approaches. **Benchmark Test Cases** The benchmark test cases are defined in the "Individual test cases" section. There are two test cases: 1. **VERSI STANDAR**: This test case uses a simple and straightforward approach to set the innerHTML property of an HTML element multiple times. 2. **VERSI KOMPRESS**: This test case also sets the innerHTML property of an HTML element multiple times, but with a slight twist. It defines two functions: `getByiD` and `setInner`. The `getByiD` function returns the result of calling `document.getElementById`, and the `setInner` function updates the innerHTML property of an element. **What's Being Tested** Both test cases are testing how fast it is to set the innerHTML property of a specific HTML element multiple times. However, the VERSI KOMPRESS test case uses two functions instead of directly accessing the element's ID, which might affect the performance. **Options Compared** The main options being compared are: * Direct access vs. using a function to retrieve an element by its ID * Using `innerHTML` property directly (VERSI STANDAR) vs. assigning a string value to an element (not explicitly mentioned in the provided code, but implied in the test cases) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Direct Access (VERSI STANDAR)**: * Pros: Simple, straightforward, and likely to be faster since it doesn't involve function calls. * Cons: May be less efficient due to repeated DOM lookups. 2. **Using Functions (VERSI KOMPRESS)**: * Pros: Could potentially be more efficient if the `getByiD` function is cached or optimized for performance. * Cons: Adds overhead from function calls, which might slow down the test. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the provided code. However, it's worth noting that libraries like jQuery can optimize DOM lookups and manipulation, but their use would require additional context. **Special JavaScript Features** None of the special JavaScript features are explicitly used in the provided code. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to testing performance could include: * Using a different element or HTML structure * Adding more iterations or variations to the test cases * Using a different browser or device platform * Testing with different content types (e.g., strings, numbers, booleans) * Using a benchmarking framework like Benchmark.js or Microbenchmark It's also worth noting that measuring performance can be affected by many factors beyond just the JavaScript code itself, such as: * Browser cache and caching mechanisms * Network latency and bandwidth * System resources and hardware limitations * Operating system and device configuration
Related benchmarks:
aaaaafffffffffffffggg
OPTIMASI OPERASI VS OPTIMASI KARAKTER
JQUERY VS VANILLA v-na0
JQUERY VS VANILLA v-na1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?