Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName lexlexa
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
querySelector vs getElementByClassName
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="card card-slim gl-overflow-hidden"> <div class="card-header gl-display-flex gl-justify-content-space-between panel-empty-heading border-bottom-0" > <h3 class="card-title h5 position-relative gl-my-0 gl-display-flex gl-align-items-center gl-h-7" > <a id="user-content-related-issues" aria-hidden="true" href="#related-issues" class="gl-link anchor position-absolute gl-text-decoration-none" ></a> Linked issues <a aria-label="Read more about related issues" rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="/help/user/project/issues/related_issues" class="gl-link gl-display-flex gl-align-items-center gl-ml-2 gl-text-gray-500" ><svg data-testid="question-icon" aria-hidden="true" class="gl-icon s12" role="text" > <use href="/assets/icons-2fb014ce49a3e87b1e47aae4b8adfa35e6b59f49e1474a18a2518ad2285bce08.svg#question" ></use> </svg></a> <div class="gl-display-inline-flex"> <div class="js-related-issues-header-issue-count gl-display-inline-flex gl-mx-5" > <span class="gl-display-inline-flex gl-align-items-center" ><svg data-testid="issues-icon" aria-hidden="true" class="gl-mr-2 gl-text-gray-500 gl-icon s16" > <use href="/assets/icons-2fb014ce49a3e87b1e47aae4b8adfa35e6b59f49e1474a18a2518ad2285bce08.svg#issues" ></use> </svg> 0 </span> </div> <button data-qa-selector="related_issues_plus_button" aria-label="Add a related issue" type="button" class="btn js-issue-count-badge-add-button btn-default btn-md gl-button btn-icon" > <svg data-testid="plus-icon" aria-hidden="true" class="gl-button-icon gl-icon s16" > <use href="/assets/icons-2fb014ce49a3e87b1e47aae4b8adfa35e6b59f49e1474a18a2518ad2285bce08.svg#plus" ></use> </svg> </button> </div> </h3> </div> <div class="linked-issues-card-body bg-gray-light"> </div> </div>
Tests:
querySelector
document.querySelector('.card-header').querySelector('.gl-mx-5')
getElementByClassName
document.getElementsByClassName('card-header')[0].getElementsByClassName('gl-mx-5')[0]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelector
getElementByClassName
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two ways to select elements in HTML: `document.querySelector` and `document.getElementsByClassName`. The test case uses an HTML structure with a single `<div>` element that contains another `<div>` element with class `card-header` and another one with class `gl-mx-5`. **Options Compared** There are two options compared: 1. **`document.querySelector('.card-header').querySelector('.gl-mx-5')`**: This code uses the `querySelector` method to select the first element with class `card-header`, and then uses `querySelector` again to select the first element with class `gl-mx-5` within that selected element. 2. **`document.getElementsByClassName('card-header')[0].getElementsByClassName('gl-mx-5')[0]`**: This code uses the `getElementsByClassName` method to select all elements with class `card-header`, gets the first one, and then uses `getElementsByClassName` again to select the first element with class `gl-mx-5` within that selected element. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`document.querySelector('.card-header').querySelector('.gl-mx-5')`**: * Pros: More efficient and modern way of selecting elements, as it uses a single method to find the desired element. * Cons: May not work in older browsers that don't support `querySelector`. 2. **`document.getElementsByClassName('card-header')[0].getElementsByClassName('gl-mx-5')[0]`**: * Pros: Works in older browsers, as it uses a more traditional method for selecting elements by class name. * Cons: Less efficient and less modern way of selecting elements. **Library Used** None are explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, `getElementsByClassName` is a standard HTML method for selecting elements by class name. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** None are used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: * If you need to support older browsers that don't support `querySelector`, use the second approach. * If you want a more efficient and modern way of selecting elements, use the first approach. * Be aware that both approaches have some overhead due to the method calls. **Alternative Approaches** Other ways to select elements in JavaScript include: 1. **`document.querySelector('[data-qa-selector="card-header"]')`**: This uses an attribute selector to find the desired element. 2. **`document.querySelectorAll('.card-header')[0]`**: This uses `querySelectorAll` to select all elements with class `card-header` and then gets the first one. These alternatives may have different performance characteristics and are suitable for specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
getElementsByClassName, querySelector
getElementsByClassName, querySelector
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName ccc1
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName ccc2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?