Benchmark: lodash get vs native javascript

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/immer@3.1.3/dist/immer.umd.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

state =  {
    data: {
      data1: {
        data2: 'test'
      }
    }
  };

Tests:

lodash get
const result = _.get(state, ['data', 'data1', 'data2'])
CloneDeep
const result = state?.data?.data1?.data2

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash get
CloneDeep

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.get asjfoasijdfio
lodash.get vs optional chaining
Native Object.values().some() vs lodash _.some()
lodash.get vs optional chaining(babel) vs optional chaining(es2020) vs Without Optional chaining
lodash.get vs optional chaining 2

lodash get vs native javascript (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash get vs CloneDeep

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash get

CloneDeep

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results