Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
document.getElementsByClassname vs document.querySelector
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Query by class vs QuerySelector
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test">Test</div>
Tests:
Query by class
var test = document.getElementsByClassName('test'); test.innerHTML;
QuerySelector
var test = document.querySelector('.test'); test.innerHTML;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Query by class
QuerySelector
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark definition and its implications. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two different methods for retrieving HTML elements based on their class name: 1. `document.getElementsByClassName('test')` 2. `document.querySelector('.test')` Both approaches are used to select an HTML element with a class name of "test". **Options compared:** * `getElementsByClassName` (implemented in the browser's DOM API) * `querySelector` (also implemented in the browser's DOM API) **Pros and Cons:** * **getElementsByClassName:** + Pros: - Typically faster for selecting multiple elements with the same class name. - May be more memory-efficient since it returns a NodeList (a live collection of elements). + Cons: - Can return multiple elements if there are multiple elements with the same class name on the page. * **querySelector:** + Pros: - Typically faster for selecting a single element, especially when using CSS selectors like `.test`. - Returns a single Element object, which can be more convenient to work with than a NodeList. + Cons: - May be slower for selecting multiple elements. - Requires the use of CSS selectors, which can add complexity. **Other considerations:** * **Browser support:** Both `getElementsByClassName` and `querySelector` are widely supported across modern browsers. However, older browsers may not support them, or may have different implementations. * **Performance differences:** The benchmark results show that `querySelector` is faster than `getElementsByClassName` for selecting a single element in this specific test case. **Libraries:** None mentioned in the provided data. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None mentioned in the provided data. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives for retrieving HTML elements based on their class name include: * Using an ID selector (e.g., `document.getElementById('id')`) * Using a CSS selector engine like Sizzle (used by jQuery) * Writing custom code using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js However, these alternatives are not being compared in this specific benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName test
querySelector() vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
getElementsByClassName()[0] vs querySelectorAll
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName My
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?