Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
parentElement vs closestParent function
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
parentElement vs closestParent
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="1"> <div class="2"> <div class="3"> <div class="4"> <div class="5"> <div class="5"> <div class="6"> <div class="7"> <div class="8"> <div class="9"> <div class="10"> <div class="11"> <div class="12"> <div class="13"> <div class="14"> <div class="15"> <div class="16"> <div class="17"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div>
Script Preparation code:
var class17 = document.getElementsByClassName("17"); Object.prototype.closestParent = function(tag, multi) { var el=this.parentNode; var newTag = tag.slice(1); var g = 0; if(tag[0] === "."){while(el && g < multi){if(el.className !== newTag){g++;el=el.parentNode;}else{return el;}}} if(tag[0] === "#"){while(el && g < multi){if(el.id !== newTag){g++;el=el.parentNode;}else{return el;}}} };
Tests:
parentElement
for(i=0;i<1000;i++){ console.log(class17[0].parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement); }
closestParent
for(i=0;i<1000;i++){ console.log(class17[0].closestParent(".1", 99)); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
parentElement
closestParent
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JavaScript features, and alternatives. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to find the closest parent element: 1. `parentElement`: a built-in JavaScript method that returns the immediate parent element. 2. `closestParent`: a custom function implemented in the provided script preparation code. **Options Comparison** The two options are compared in the individual test cases, which run for 1000 iterations each. The test cases measure the execution time of each option: 1. **`parentElement`**: This method is built-in to JavaScript and uses the DOM API to traverse the element tree. 2. **`closestParent`**: This custom function traverses the DOM tree using a while loop, checking for matching class or ID names. **Pros and Cons** **`parentElement`**: Pros: * Built-in method: widely supported across browsers * Optimized for performance by leveraging browser internals Cons: * May not work as expected in certain edge cases (e.g., complex DOM structures) * Limited control over the traversal process **`closestParent`**: Pros: * Customizable: allows fine-grained control over the traversal process * Can handle more complex DOM structures Cons: * Not built-in: may be less efficient than `parentElement` * May not work across all browsers (especially older ones) **Library Usage** The benchmark uses a custom implementation of `closestParent`, which is defined in the script preparation code. This function relies on JavaScript's `Object.prototype` and uses a while loop to traverse the DOM tree. **Special JavaScript Features** There are no special JavaScript features mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two fundamental approaches to finding closest parent elements. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to measure element traversal performance could include: * Using a library like jQuery, which provides a `closest()` method * Implementing a recursive function to traverse the DOM tree * Utilizing Web Workers or other parallel computing techniques to speed up element traversal However, it's essential to note that these alternatives might not be directly comparable to the built-in `parentElement` and custom `closestParent` methods used in this benchmark. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Javascript closest method vs closestParent prototype function
Finding parent element: Closest vs Loop vs Recursion
parent vs closest 555
parentElement vs parentNode vs closest(tag) vs closest(.class) vs closest(tag.class)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?