Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash isString
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_lodash vs native
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
const a = 'Hello world!'
Tests:
_lodash
_.isString('Hello world!')
native
typeof 'Hello world!' === "string" ? true : false
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_lodash
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
_lodash
207245696.0 Ops/sec
native
230955120.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a benchmark for testing the performance of two approaches: using Lodash's `isString` function and a native JavaScript approach using `typeof`. The main components of the benchmark definition are: * **Script Preparation Code**: This is the code that needs to be executed before running each test case. In this case, it simply assigns the string "Hello world!" to a variable named `a`. * **Html Preparation Code**: This is the HTML code that needs to be included in the page before running each test case. It includes a script tag that loads the Lodash library. * **Benchmark Definition**: This specifies the actual benchmarking code that will be executed. There are two benchmark definitions: + The first one uses the `_.isString` function from Lodash, passing the string "Hello world!" as an argument. + The second one uses a native JavaScript approach: it checks if the type of "Hello world!" is equal to "string" using the ternary operator. **Options Compared** The two options compared in this benchmark are: * **Lodash's `isString` function**: This function takes a value as an argument and returns a boolean indicating whether the value is a string. * **Native JavaScript approach using `typeof`**: This approach uses the `typeof` operator to check if the type of "Hello world!" is equal to "string". If it is, it returns true; otherwise, it returns false. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash's `isString` function**: + Pros: - This approach is more concise and readable. - It is a part of the Lodash library, so you don't need to define it yourself. + Cons: - You need to include the entire Lodash library in your page, which can increase the page load time. * **Native JavaScript approach using `typeof`**: + Pros: - This approach is more efficient since it doesn't require loading an external library. + Cons: - It requires you to define the logic yourself, which can make the code less readable. **Library** The Lodash library is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides various functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array processing, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash's `isString` function is used to check if a value is a string. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the provided code. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers support features like arrow functions (`=>`) and template literals (`${}`), which are not used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you want to test other approaches, you could consider the following alternatives: * Using a different string manipulation function from Lodash (e.g., `_.toString()`). * Using a different type checking approach (e.g., using `===` instead of `typeof`). * Testing the performance of different JavaScript engines or implementations (e.g., V8 vs. SpiderMonkey).
Related benchmarks:
isEmpty vs. vanilla
empty arr
test string to uppercase cr
Lodash isString fork
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?