Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
indexOf vs split - test
(version: 0)
testing speed
Comparing performance of:
indexOf vs split
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var test1 = 'test,tester,testing' var test2 = 'test,tester' var test3 = 'testa'
Tests:
indexOf
var result1 = (test1.indexOf('test') !== -1); var result2 = (test2.indexOf('tester') !== -1); var result3 = (test3.indexOf('test') !== -1);
split
var result1 = (test1.split(',').includes('test')); var result2 = (test2.split(',').includes('tester')); var result3 = (test3.split(',').includes('testa'));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
indexOf
split
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.3.1 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 17 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
indexOf
15569949.0 Ops/sec
split
8535877.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's tested on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which includes the following information: * `Name`: A unique name for the benchmark, in this case, "indexOf vs split - test". * `Description`: A brief description of the benchmark, indicating that it tests speed. * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These sections contain JavaScript code that is executed before running the benchmark. In this case, they define two test strings: `test1`, `test2`, and `test3`. The purpose of these strings will become clear later. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark definition includes two individual test cases: * **indexOf**: This test case measures the performance of the `indexOf` method on an array or string. + The `Benchmark Definition` code snippet demonstrates how to use `indexOf` on `test1`, `test2`, and `test3`. The expected result is a boolean value indicating whether the specified substring exists in the original string. * **split**: This test case measures the performance of the `split()` method on an array or string. + The `Benchmark Definition` code snippet demonstrates how to use `split()` with a comma-separated separator on `test1`, `test2`, and `test3`. The expected result is a boolean value indicating whether the specified substring exists in the resulting array. **Pros, Cons, and Considerations** The choice between using `indexOf` and `split()` depends on several factors: * **Performance**: In general, `indexOf` is faster than `split()` because it only searches for an exact match, whereas `split()` creates a new array with substrings, which can be slower. * **Readability**: `indexOf` is often considered more readable when searching for a specific substring within a string. However, `split()` can be useful when you need to extract substrings or split a string into an array of substrings. * **Regular expressions**: If you need to search for patterns in strings, `indexOf` might not be the best choice, as it only searches for exact matches. In such cases, `split()` with regular expression support (e.g., using the `g` flag) or other libraries like RegEx might be more suitable. **Library Usage** The benchmark code uses a few built-in JavaScript functions: * `indexOf()`: A built-in method for searching an index of the first occurrence of a substring within another string. * `split()`: A built-in method for splitting a string into an array of substrings based on a specified separator. No external libraries are required for this benchmark, as it only utilizes standard JavaScript functions. **Special JS Features** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the provided code snippet. The focus is on comparing the performance of two fundamental string manipulation methods: `indexOf` and `split()`. **Other Alternatives** If you needed to test other string manipulation methods, here are some alternatives: * **Substring replacement**: You could use `replace()` to find and replace substrings within a string. * **Regular expressions**: As mentioned earlier, using RegEx with the `g` flag can provide more flexibility when searching for patterns in strings. * **Array methods**: Other array methods like `includes()`, `findIndex()`, or `filter()` could be used to search for substrings within arrays. Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely require different JavaScript code and might not directly compare to the performance of `indexOf` and `split()`.
Related benchmarks:
indexOf vs split
Incldues split vs indexOf
indexOf vs split for finding sub string
indexOf vs test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?