Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs es6 in join method
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash join method vs es6 filter method
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = ['1', '2', '3', '4' ];
Tests:
lodash join method
_.join(array, ',')
es6 filter method
array.join(',')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash join method
es6 filter method
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 133 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
lodash join method
18427988.0 Ops/sec
es6 filter method
18082952.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript methods: `_.join()` from Lodash and `array.join()`. Both methods aim to concatenate an array of strings into a single string, separated by commas. **Options Compared** 1. **Lodash (`_.join()`)**: A utility library that provides a set of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string formatting, and more. 2. **ES6 `array.join()`**: A built-in method in JavaScript's ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) standard, introduced to provide a concise way to concatenate arrays. **Pros and Cons** **Lodash (`_.join()`)**: Pros: * Provides a reliable, tested implementation of the join method. * Supports various types of separators, not just commas. Cons: * Adds extra overhead due to the library's initialization and execution time. * May introduce performance regressions compared to native methods. **ES6 `array.join()`**: Pros: * Native implementation with minimal overhead. * Fast and efficient. Cons: * Limited flexibility in terms of separator types. * Requires support for ES6 features, which might not be available on older browsers or environments. **Library Overview** In this benchmark, Lodash is used to implement the `_.join()` method. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string formatting, and more. The library is designed to be lightweight and easy to use, with a focus on making common tasks easier and more efficient. **Special JavaScript Feature/ Syntax** The benchmark uses ES6's `let` and `const` keywords, which are introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as part of the language standard. These keywords provide block scope for variables, which can help prevent variable hoisting issues and improve code readability. **Other Alternatives** For those who might be interested in alternative implementations or comparisons: * For a native implementation without using Lodash, you could compare `Array.prototype.join()` with custom logic. * Another library like underscore.js or ramda might also be used for comparison. * You might also want to test the performance of different separator types or edge cases. Keep in mind that the choice of implementation and libraries can significantly impact the benchmark's results. The focus on Lodash and ES6 `array.join()` allows users to easily compare the performance of these two widely used methods.
Related benchmarks:
array join vs _.join
_.join() vs Array.join()
Join: Lodash vs Native
lodash join vs native join
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?