Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Get html, innerHTML vs $.html--
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Jquery html vs vanilla innerHtml
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.4.1/underscore-min.js"></script> <script type="text/template" id="template"> Hello <%-obj.name%> </script>
Tests:
Jquery html
_.template($('#template').html(), {name: 'hello'});
vanilla innerHtml
_.template(document.getElementById('template').innerHTML, {name: 'hello'});
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Jquery html
vanilla innerHtml
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its various components. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches for rendering template data: using jQuery's `.html()` method versus using vanilla JavaScript with `innerHTML`. The test cases use Underscore.js (a popular JavaScript library) to define a template string, which is then used to render data. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON defines the benchmark: * "Name": A descriptive name for the benchmark. * "Description": An optional description of the benchmark. * "Script Preparation Code": The code that sets up any external libraries or scripts required by the benchmark. In this case, it includes jQuery and Underscore.js. * "Html Preparation Code": The HTML template used in the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: 1. **"Jquery html"`**: This test case uses jQuery's `.html()` method to set the innerHTML of an element with the ID `template`. 2. **"vanilla innerHtml"`**: This test case uses vanilla JavaScript (without jQuery) to set the `innerHTML` property of an element with the same ID `template`. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. Using jQuery's `.html()` method (`Jquery html`) 2. Using vanilla JavaScript with `innerHTML` (`vanilla innerHtml`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** * **Using jQuery's `.html()` method (Jquery html):** * Pros: * Easier to use, especially when working with complex template structures. * Often provides better performance due to jQuery's optimized rendering mechanism. * Cons: * Adds an extra library dependency and may increase overall bundle size. * **Using vanilla JavaScript with `innerHTML` (vanilla innerHtml):** * Pros: * No additional library dependencies, which can reduce bundle size. * May be preferred for smaller projects or when minimizing dependencies is essential. * Cons: * Requires more manual effort to set up and manage the rendering process. **Underscore.js Library** In this benchmark, Underscore.js (a popular JavaScript library) is used to define a template string. Specifically, it's used with the `_.template()` function, which takes an HTML element as input and renders data into it using the defined template. The `_.template()` function uses the `innerHTML` property of the element, which is then set to render the actual template content. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark. It relies solely on standard JavaScript and Underscore.js functionality. **Other Alternatives** If you were to recreate this benchmark, you could also explore alternative approaches for rendering templates, such as: * Using a templating engine like Handlebars.js * Implementing your own custom template rendering mechanism * Leveraging other libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Get html, innerHTML vs $.html
Get html, innerHTML vs $.html -- _ vs {}
templte tmpl vs underscore v2
templte tmpl vs underscore v3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?