Benchmark: Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf 1

Script Preparation code:

var hasZero = [];
var withoutZero = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  hasZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000));
  withoutZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 1)
}

Tests:

Array.some
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.some(v => v === 0);
Array.filter
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.filter(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.filter(v => v === 0);
Array.indexOf
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.indexOf(0) > -1 : withoutZero.indexOf(0) > -1;
Array.for
var data = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero : withoutZero; var action = (a) => a === 0; var length = data.length; var tempResult = false; for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) { const tempResult = action(data[i], i); if (tempResult === true) { break; } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.some
Array.filter
Array.indexOf
Array.for

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.some	98691.1 Ops/sec
Array.filter	34638.3 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf	1280935.1 Ops/sec
Array.for	213154.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf 1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Array.some vs Array.filter vs Array.indexOf vs Array.for

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.some

Array.filter

Array.indexOf

Array.for

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A