Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
template
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
template vs array
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
template
let s = ""; for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){ s = "${s}${i}"; }
array
const a = []; for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){ a.push(i); } a.join('');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
template
array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark data and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The `Benchmark Definition` is an empty string (`"````) in this case, but typically, it would contain the JavaScript code to be executed for each test case. This code defines the logic or algorithm to be measured. However, given that there are two test cases with their own benchmark definitions: 1. `"let s = "";\r\nfor(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){\r\n s = \"${s}${i}\";\r\n}"` This code is a template string concatenation example. It creates an empty string `s` and then iterates from 0 to 9, appending the current value of `i` to the string `s`. 2. `"const a = [];\r\nfor(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){\r\n a.push(i);\r\n}\r\na.join('');"` This code creates an empty array `a`, iterates from 0 to 9, and pushes each value into the array. Finally, it joins all elements in the array into a single string separated by spaces. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare the performance of template string concatenation (`template`) against using an array for iteration and then joining its elements (`array`). **Pros and Cons** * **Template String Concatenation (`template`):** + Pros: - Can be more readable, as it allows embedding expressions directly in the string. - Does not require creating a separate collection (like an array) to store intermediate results. + Cons: - May incur performance overhead due to repeated string concatenations. - Less efficient than using an array for iteration and then joining its elements, as it requires more memory allocation and deallocation. * **Array-based Iteration and Joining (`array`):** + Pros: - Can be more efficient, especially when dealing with large datasets, since arrays provide O(1) access to elements. - Less prone to performance issues due to repeated string concatenations. + Cons: - May require more memory allocation and deallocation for the array itself. - May be less readable for developers unfamiliar with using arrays in this context. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the provided benchmark definitions. However, template literals (used in the first example) are a built-in JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). If you were to use an external library for template string concatenation or array manipulation, it might impact performance and correctness. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The template literals (`${s}${i}`) used in the first example is a new syntax introduced in ES6, which allows embedding expressions directly inside strings. This feature provides a more readable way to concatenate strings with dynamic values but may incur a slight performance overhead due to its parsing complexity. **Other Alternatives** In addition to template literals and array-based iteration, other alternatives for string concatenation or data manipulation might include: * String formatting libraries (e.g., Moment.js) for complex formatting tasks * Higher-order functions (e.g., `reduce()`, `map()`) for iterative processing of datasets * Third-party libraries (e.g., Lodash) that provide optimized algorithms and data structures for common use cases Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on the specific requirements, performance constraints, and coding style preferences.
Related benchmarks:
mustache rendering performance - parsed vs unparsed
Handlebars vs Hogan vs Mustache
Handlebars vs Hogan vs Mustache rendering
Hogan vs Mustache vs HB
Handlebars vs Hogan vs Mustache (Updated versions2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?