Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (Deeper object)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.2/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var MyObject = { description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.', myNumber: 123456789, myBoolean: true, jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...', jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...', jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...' , jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...' , jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...' , jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...' , jayson: { stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....', parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...' }}}}}}} }; var myCopy = null;
Tests:
Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Json clone
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Json clone
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data for the MeasureThat.net JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to create a deep copy of an object in JavaScript: 1. Using Lodash (`_.cloneDeep` method) 2. Using the `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())` method **Options compared:** * **Lodash (`_.cloneDeep`)**: The `_.cloneDeep` method from the popular utility library, Lodash, is used to create a deep copy of an object. + Pros: - Provides a robust and efficient way to create deep copies of objects. - Supports creation of complex data structures like arrays and objects. + Cons: - Requires including additional library code (Lodash). - May introduce additional dependencies and overhead. * **`JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())`**: This method uses the `JSON.stringify()` function to convert an object into a JSON string, which can then be parsed back into an object using `JSON.parse()`. The resulting object is a shallow copy of the original. **Pros and Cons:** * **Lodash (`_.cloneDeep`)**: + Pros: efficient, supports deep copies, and robust. + Cons: requires additional library code and dependencies. * **`JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())`**: + Pros: lightweight, easy to implement. + Cons: only creates shallow copies, may not support complex data structures. **Library Used:** In this benchmark, the Lodash library is used. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object creation, and more. The `_.cloneDeep` method is specifically designed to create deep copies of objects, making it a convenient choice for this benchmark. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond standard JavaScript functionality. **Other Considerations:** * For large datasets or complex data structures, Lodash (`_.cloneDeep`) might be a better choice due to its robustness and efficiency. * If memory is a concern and only shallow copies are required, the `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())` method could be sufficient. **Alternatives:** If you need alternative methods for creating deep copies of objects, consider the following options: 1. **`.slice()` and `.concat()`**: These methods can be used to create shallow copies of arrays or objects. 2. **`.Object.assign()`**: This method creates a new object with copies of all properties from an existing object. 3. **`Array.prototype.slice()`** (for array copying) 4. **`Object.create(null)`** (for creating empty objects) Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide the same level of robustness or support for complex data structures as Lodash's `_.cloneDeep` method. Let me know if you'd like further clarification on any of these points!
Related benchmarks:
lodash clonedeep vs json.parse(stringify()) vs recursivecopy vs shallowcopy
lodash clonedeep vs json.parse(stringify()) vs recursivecopy new big
Plain Json: lodash clonedeep vs json.parse(stringify())
Lodash cloneDeep vs structuredClone vs recursiveDeepCopy vs JSON clone with a more deep test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?