Benchmark: Less than or equal to vs less than

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="d">Hi</div>

Tests:

Less than or equal to
for (i=1;i<=1999;i++) console.log(i+document.getElementById('d').innerHTML);
Less than
for (i=1;i<2000;i++) console.log(i+document.getElementById('d').innerHTML);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Less than or equal to
Less than

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/131.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Less than or equal to	54.7 Ops/sec
Less than	57.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark tests two different ways to compare values in JavaScript: using `<=` (less than or equal) and using `<` (less than). The test cases use a simple loop that prints the sum of an incrementing variable `i` and the inner HTML content of an element with ID "d".

**Options being compared**

There are two main options being compared:

1. **Less than or equal (`<=`)**: This operator checks if the value on its left is less than or equal to the value on its right.
2. **Less than (<)**: This operator checks if the value on its left is strictly less than the value on its right.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

*   `<=`:
    *   Pros:
        *   Can handle cases where both values are negative or zero, making it a useful option when dealing with ranges.
        *   Can be faster in some cases because it's often optimized by the JavaScript engine.
    *   Cons:
        *   May lead to unexpected results if not used carefully (e.g., comparing floating-point numbers).
*   `<`:
    *   Pros:
        *   Provides a strict comparison, which can help catch bugs and reduce errors in code.
        *   Can be useful when dealing with exact numerical equality or ordering values.

**Library usage**

In this benchmark, the `document.getElementById` method is used to access an element's inner HTML content. This is a built-in DOM (Document Object Model) API provided by web browsers for interacting with web pages. The `innerHTML` property returns the HTML content of an element as a string.

No external libraries are required for this benchmark, making it a native JavaScript test case.

**Special JS features or syntax**

There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark beyond what's typically available in modern JavaScript implementations (ECMAScript). No advanced topics like async/await, Promises, or Web APIs are utilized.

Now that we've broken down the test case, let's discuss alternative approaches:

*   **Benchmarks with different data structures**: If the goal is to compare performance on different data types (e.g., integers vs. floats), additional test cases could be created using various data structures like arrays or objects.
*   **Benchmarks with more complex expressions**: More complex expressions involving multiple operators, functions, or logical operations could be added to better represent real-world scenarios and provide a more comprehensive understanding of performance differences between `<=` and `<`.
*   **Benchmarks across different browsers and environments**: Adding test cases that run on various browsers (e.g., Chrome, Firefox) or platforms (e.g., Node.js, WebAssembly) would provide a broader perspective on how these operators perform under different execution contexts.

These alternatives can help create a more comprehensive benchmark suite that provides insights into the performance of `<=` and `<` in diverse JavaScript scenarios.

Related benchmarks:

Less than or equal to vs less than (version: 0)

Less than or equal to versus less than

Comparing performance of: Less than or equal to vs Less than

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Less than or equal to

Less than

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):