Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash uniq vs set (Albert edition)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Set vs Array
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.15/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Set
var l = [...new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7])]; return l;
Array
var l = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7]; return _.uniq(l);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Set
Array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what is being tested and the different approaches compared. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition describes two test cases: `Array` and `Set`. The test cases are designed to measure the performance of JavaScript arrays with duplicate elements versus using a library like Lodash for uniqueness. **Options Compared** * **Array**: This approach uses an array with duplicate elements, such as `[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7]`. * **Set**: This approach uses a Set data structure to eliminate duplicate elements. The JavaScript Set data type is implemented as a hash table, which provides constant-time performance for add, delete, and lookup operations. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** * **Array Approach** * **Pros:** * Simpler code execution * More intuitive for developers familiar with arrays * **Cons:** * Poor performance due to duplicate elements requiring extra processing time * **Set Approach (using Lodash)** * **Pros:** * Efficient use of Set data structure for uniqueness * Easy to implement using a library like Lodash * **Cons:** * Additional overhead from importing and initializing the Lodash library * May introduce additional complexity for developers unfamiliar with Sets **Library and Its Purpose** The `lodash` library is used in one of the test cases (`Array`). The main purpose of this library is to provide a unified and consistent interface for functional programming tasks, such as array manipulation and data processing. In this specific case, `_uniq(l)` is used to remove duplicate elements from an array. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None of the provided benchmark definitions uses any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard ES6 JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** * **Manual Set Implementation**: Another approach would be to manually implement a Set-like data structure using JavaScript's built-in data structures, such as objects with key-value pairs. This approach would require custom implementation and might be less efficient than using an existing library like Lodash. * **Native Set Data Structure (if available)**: If the target environment supports native Set data structures (e.g., modern browsers or Node.js), this could provide a more efficient solution compared to relying on JavaScript libraries. These alternatives would require modifications to the benchmark definition and test code, but they can be explored for different scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
lodash uniq vs vanilla set - final
lodash uniq vs native uniq
Lodash uniq vs Set to unique array
Lodash - uniq
Lodash uniqBy vs Javascript uniqBy
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?