Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Aaadkdk
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Varrrrr vs Lettttt
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
for(i=0; i<1000; i++){ let an = i;}
Tests:
Varrrrr
for(i=0; i<1000; i++){ var an = i;}
Lettttt
for(i=0; i<1000; i++){ let an = i;}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Varrrrr
Lettttt
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JavaScript code snippet that measures the performance of assigning a value to a variable using different keywords: `var`, `let`, or `const`. The code snippet assigns a loop counter (`i`) to a variable (`an`). ```javascript for(i=0; i<1000; i++){\r\nlet an = i;\r\n} ``` In this code, the variable `an` is assigned the value of the loop counter `i`. The benchmark aims to measure which keyword (or none) results in the fastest execution time. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. Using a non-declared variable with `var`: `for(i=0; i<1000; i++){\r\nvar an = i;\r\n}` 2. Using a declared variable with `let`: `for(i=0; i<1000; i++){\r\nlet an = i;\r\n}` **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using `var`**: This approach has several issues: * Variables declared with `var` are function-scoped, which can lead to unexpected behavior in nested functions or loops. * The variable's value is hoisted to the top of the scope, which means it will be initialized before its declaration, even if the assignment is done inside a loop. * This approach does not provide any benefits for performance, as it does not take advantage of JavaScript's new features (let and const). 2. **Using `let`**: This approach provides several benefits: * Variables declared with `let` are block-scoped, which reduces the risk of unexpected behavior in nested functions or loops. * The variable's value is initialized immediately after its declaration, making it more predictable. * This approach can take advantage of JavaScript's new features, such as hoisting and redeclaration. **Library** None. The benchmark uses standard JavaScript syntax and does not rely on any external libraries. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It is a simple comparison of different variable declarations. **Other Alternatives** If the test case were to compare performance using `const`, it would be similar to the `let` approach, as `const` also creates a block-scoped variable. If the test case were to compare performance with other types of variables, such as `function`, it would depend on the specific use case and requirements. In general, this benchmark is useful for measuring the performance benefits of using modern JavaScript features like `let` and `const`. It can help developers understand the impact of these features on their code's execution speed.
Related benchmarks:
Plus equals is slow 333
For Loop Approaches
For Loop Different Approaches
Different ways of iterating through an array, two elements at a time
cycle speed
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?