Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Intl.DateTimeFormat vs ReduceReplace Date Format 2
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Intl.DateTimeFormat vs Reduce/Replace Format vs Reduce/Replace Format multiple new Date calls
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var date = 'Mar 24, 2021' var formatDateByIntlDateTimeFormat = (dateOrString) => { return new Intl.DateTimeFormat('pt-BR').format(new Date(dateOrString)) } var tokens = { // Padded day = 01, 02, ..., 31 DD: (date) => date.getDate().toString().padStart(2, '0'), // Padded month = 01, 02, ..., 12 MM: (date) => (date.getMonth() + 1).toString().padStart(2, '0'), // Padded year = 0001, 0002, ..., 1995, ..., 2020, 2021 YYYY: (date) => date.getFullYear().toString().padStart(4, '0'), }; var formatDateByReduceReplace = (dateOrString, format = 'DD/MM/YYYY') => { const date = new Date(dateOrString) return Object.entries(tokens).reduce( (result, [pattern, fn]) => result.replace(new RegExp(pattern, 'g'), fn(date)), format ); }; var formatDateByReduceReplaceMultipleNewDate = (dateOrString, format = 'DD/MM/YYYY') => { return Object.entries(tokens).reduce( (result, [pattern, fn]) => result.replace(new RegExp(pattern, 'g'), fn(new Date(dateOrString))), format ); };
Tests:
Intl.DateTimeFormat
formatDateByIntlDateTimeFormat(date)
Reduce/Replace Format
formatDateByReduceReplace(date, 'DD/MM/YYYY')
Reduce/Replace Format multiple new Date calls
formatDateByReduceReplaceMultipleNewDate(date)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Intl.DateTimeFormat
Reduce/Replace Format
Reduce/Replace Format multiple new Date calls
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares three different ways to format dates in JavaScript: 1. **Intl.DateTimeFormat**: Uses the `Intl` API (Internationalization) to format dates. 2. **Reduce/Replace Format**: A custom implementation using regular expressions and a set of predefined formatting tokens. 3. **Reduce/Replace Format multiple new Date calls**: The same as above, but with an additional step that creates a new `Date` object for each format call. **Options Compared** * **Intl.DateTimeFormat**: Uses the built-in JavaScript API to format dates. Pros: efficient and accurate, but may have limitations depending on the browser/OS. * **Reduce/Replace Format**: A custom implementation using regular expressions and tokens. Pros: flexible and easy to understand, but may be slower due to the overhead of creating a new `Date` object for each call. * **Reduce/Replace Format multiple new Date calls**: Adds an extra step that creates a new `Date` object for each format call. This approach is likely slower than the other two options. **Pros and Cons** * **Intl.DateTimeFormat**: + Pros: efficient, accurate, and widely supported. + Cons: may not work as expected in older browsers or with certain locales. * **Reduce/Replace Format**: + Pros: flexible, easy to understand, and works well for simple date formats. + Cons: slower due to the overhead of creating a new `Date` object for each call. * **Reduce/Replace Format multiple new Date calls**: + Pros: potentially faster than Reduce/Replace Format by avoiding the need to create a new `Date` object for each format call. + Cons: likely slower than Intl.DateTimeFormat due to the extra step of creating new `Date` objects. **Library Used** None is explicitly mentioned, but the use of regular expressions and tokens suggests that a basic understanding of JavaScript regex and string manipulation is required. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark uses the following features: * **Intl API**: The Intl.DateTimeFormat function uses the Internationalization API to format dates. * **Regular Expressions**: The Reduce/Replace Format implementation uses regular expressions to replace formatting tokens with actual values. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches could be explored, such as using a dedicated date formatting library like Moment.js or Luxon. However, these libraries may add additional overhead and dependencies compared to the Intl API and custom regex-based implementation. In general, the benchmark provides a useful comparison of different date formatting approaches in JavaScript, highlighting the trade-offs between efficiency, accuracy, and flexibility.
Related benchmarks:
DateTimeFormat vs toLocaleDateString 3
Intl.DateTimeFormat vs Reduce/Replace Format
Intl.DateTimeFormat (optimized) vs new Date().toLocaleDateString()
new Intl.DateTimeFormat vs new Date().toLocaleDateString() vs re-using formatter
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?