Benchmark: immutable vs lodash vs ...

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/immutable/4.0.0-rc.12/immutable.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data0 = {};
var data1 = {};
var data2 = Immutable.Map({});

Tests:

immutable
var result = data2.set('a', '1').toObject();
lodash
var result = _.set(data1, 'a', '1');
...
var result = {...data0, a: "1"}

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
immutable
lodash
...

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of three approaches:

1. Immutable.js (also known as "...")
2. Lodash
3. Native JavaScript object manipulation

**What is tested?**

The benchmark tests how fast each approach can create an immutable object by setting a property on it and then converting it back to an object using the `toObject()` or spread operator (`...`).

**Options compared**

1. **Immutable.js**: A library that provides immutable data structures, allowing you to work with data without modifying it directly.
2. **Lodash**: A utility library that provides a function called `_set()`, which sets a property on an object.
3. **Native JavaScript object manipulation**: Using the native `set()` and `toObject()` methods or the spread operator (`...`) for object creation.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Immutable.js**:
	* Pros: Immutable data structures can lead to predictable and easier-to-debug code, as well as improved thread-safety.
	* Cons: Can be slower than native JavaScript approaches due to the overhead of creating immutable objects.
2. **Lodash**:
	* Pros: `_set()` is a simple and efficient way to set properties on objects.
	* Cons: Adds external dependency, which may increase bundle size and complexity.
3. **Native JavaScript object manipulation**:
	* Pros: Fastest approach, as it leverages the native `set()` and `toObject()` methods or the spread operator (`...`).
	* Cons: May lead to mutable state if not used carefully.

**Other considerations**

* The benchmark uses Chrome 95 on a Linux desktop environment, which might affect the results.
* The use of Immutable.js is denoted by three dots ("...") in the Benchmark Definition string, indicating that this is the library being tested.
* Lodash is explicitly mentioned as the second option compared.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for immutable data structures include:

1. **Ramda**: A functional programming library that provides immutable data structures and higher-order functions.
2. **Underscore.js**: Another utility library that provides immutable data structures, although not as extensive as Immutable.js or Ramda.

Keep in mind that the choice of library ultimately depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.

Related benchmarks:

immutable vs lodash vs ... (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: immutable vs lodash vs ...

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

immutable

lodash

...

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):