Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
of vs array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
of vs array
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
of
const x = Float32Array.of(1,2,3);
array
const x = new Float32Array(3); x[0] = 1; x[1] = 2; x[2] = 3;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
of
array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided `BenchmarkDefinition` is empty, which means that the user did not specify any specific benchmarking logic or setup. The website likely expects the user to provide a script preparation code and HTML preparation code, but in this case, both are null. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"of"** This test case is defined by the following JavaScript statement: ```javascript const x = Float32Array.of(1,2,3); ``` The `Float32Array.of()` method creates a new `Float32Array` instance with the specified values (1, 2, and 3) in a single operation. This is an optimization provided by modern JavaScript engines to create arrays from constant-length arrays. **Library: Float32Array** The `Float32Array` library is part of the JavaScript standard library. It provides a typed array implementation for floating-point numbers, which is useful for efficient numerical computations. **Comparison Options** Two test cases are being compared: * **"of"**: Using `Float32Array.of()` * **"array"**: Creating an empty `Float32Array` instance and populating it with values (1, 2, and 3) using indexing (`x[0] = 1; x[1] = 2; x[2] = 3`) **Pros/Cons of Each Approach** * **"of"**: Pros: + Faster creation time, as it's a single operation. + Fewer memory allocations. * Cons: May not be suitable for large arrays or use cases where the array needs to be resized dynamically. * **"array"**: Pros: + More flexible and allows for dynamic resizing. + Can be useful in scenarios where the array size is unknown beforehand. * Cons: Slower creation time, as it involves multiple memory allocations. **Other Considerations** When deciding between these two approaches, consider the specific requirements of your use case: * If you need to create a fixed-size array with constant values, `Float32Array.of()` is likely the better choice for performance reasons. * If you need to create an array that may need to be resized dynamically or have varying sizes, creating an empty `Float32Array` instance and populating it using indexing (`array`) might be a more suitable approach. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives to consider when creating `Float32Array` instances: * Using the `new Float32Array(size)` constructor with a specific size argument. * Using the `Float32Array()` constructor without an explicit size, which creates an array with a default size (usually 1). * Utilizing libraries or frameworks that provide optimized array creation methods. Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
new TypedArray() vs TypedArray.of()
Array.from() vs new A
Array() vs Array.from() fill
Array.from() vs new Array() with index
Array.from() vs new Array() vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?