Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
...rest vs forEach
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
rest vs forEach vs for
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
rest
var arr1 = new Array(100).fill(999); var obj1 = arr1.reduce((acc, n, index) => { acc[index] = index; return acc; }, {}); var data = { 0: '0', 5: '5', 55: '55', 77: '77', 98: '98' }; for(var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { var res = {...obj1, ...data}; console.log(res); }
forEach
var arr1 = new Array(100).fill(999); var obj1 = arr1.reduce((acc, n, index) => { acc[index] = index; return acc; }, {}); var data = { 0: '0', 5: '5', 55: '55', 77: '77', 98: '98' }; for(var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { var res = Object.assign({}, obj1); Object.keys(data).forEach(key => { res[key] = data[key]; }); console.log(res); }
for
var arr1 = new Array(100).fill(999); var obj1 = arr1.reduce((acc, n, index) => { acc[index] = index; return acc; }, {}); var data = { 0: '0', 5: '5', 55: '55', 77: '77', 98: '98' }; for(var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { var res = Object.assign({}, obj1); var keys = Object.keys(data); for(var j = 0; j < keys.length -1; j++) { res[keys[j]] = data[keys[j]]; } console.log(res); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
rest
forEach
for
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two options: `rest` and `forEach`, which are used to compare the performance of object assignment in different ways. **Options Compared** 1. **Rest Spread Operator (`...obj1, ...data`)**: This option uses the rest spread operator to create a new object by spreading the properties of `obj1` and merging them with the properties of `data`. 2. **`forEach()` Method**: This option uses the `forEach()` method to iterate over the keys of `data` and assign their corresponding values to a new object. 3. **Manual Loop (`for`)**: This option uses a traditional loop to manually iterate over the keys of `data` and assign their corresponding values to a new object. **Pros and Cons** * **Rest Spread Operator**: + Pros: concise, efficient, and modern syntax. + Cons: may be less readable for those not familiar with it, and can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully. * **`forEach()` Method**: + Pros: easy to read and understand, and is a standard method in JavaScript. + Cons: may be slower than the rest spread operator due to the overhead of calling the `forEach()` method. * **Manual Loop**: + Pros: straightforward, easy to optimize, and can be faster for large datasets. + Cons: more verbose and prone to errors. **Library Used** None is explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the `Object.keys()` method is used to get an array of the object's keys, which is a standard method in JavaScript. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The rest spread operator (`...`) and template literals (e.g., `${data[key]}`) are used in the benchmark. These features are modern syntax in JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other ways to assign object properties, here are some alternatives: 1. **Loops**: You can use `for` loops, `while` loops, or even `Array.prototype.map()` to iterate over the keys and assign values. 2. **Object.assign() with multiple objects**: Instead of using the rest spread operator, you can pass multiple objects to `Object.assign()` to merge their properties. 3. **Using a library like Lodash**: If you need more complex object manipulation, libraries like Lodash provide functions like `merge()` and `assignIn()` that can simplify your code. Keep in mind that each approach has its trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
_.forEach vs forEach()
Array.prototype.forEach vs Lodash forEach
native for loop vs Array.prototype.forEach vs lodash forEach
map vs forEach Chris
map vs forEach Chris v2b
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?